Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br /> cleanup of groundwater and the minimization of further off-Base migration of <br /> contaminated groundwater." What secondary concerns are addressed by the Proposed <br /> Plan? <br /> Corrective Action: Reword the sentence. Delete the word "primarily" unless DDRW- <br /> Tracy wishes to include secondary concerns. <br /> 158. Response 29 <br /> The response should respond more directly to the question and assertion that <br /> formaldehyde has been found in one of the wells. (Note: EPA is surprised to learn <br /> that although embalming fluid has been handled at the site, analyses for <br /> formaldehyde have not been included in the groundwater analytes. EPA would like <br /> to discuss the appropriateness of including analyses for formaldehyde in future <br /> groundwater monitoring.) <br /> Corrective Action: Provide a more direct response to the assertion that formaldehyde <br /> has been detected in one well. Include a statement which informs the public that the <br /> Comprehensive RI/FS will determine whether formaldehyde is a chemical of <br /> concern. <br /> 159. Response 30 <br /> The response does not directly answer the question regarding carbon tetrachloride, <br /> and whether "it was registered as a warehouse fumigant" <br /> Corrective Action: Respond to the specific question. <br /> 160. Response 31 <br /> This definition of OU #1 is not consistent with the definition used in the beginning <br /> of the ROD. <br /> Corrective Action: Replace the definition of OU #1 with the revised definition used <br /> in section entitled "Description of the Remedy." <br /> 161. Response 32 <br /> While it is appropriate to state that the Comprehensive RI/FS will evaluate <br /> formaldehyde exposure via inhalation of dust particles, the response does not <br /> address the possibility of a worker being exposed via this means. <br /> Corrective Action: Provide a response to the question. <br /> 162. Response 34 <br /> The text states, regarding the comment that the cited trenches need to be more fully <br /> EPA/R9 June 7, 1993 39/40 <br />