SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

defined, that these sources will be evaluated in the Comprehensive RI/FS and "follow-on studies" and are not a part of OU #1. Corrective Action: It would be more responsive to state what investigations are planned for these areas (rather than mention that they are not a part of OU #0. Further, explain which follow-on studies are planned. 163. Response 40 It is not clear to EPA that the commenter is asking about land valuation. Corrective Action: Provide more detail on the context of the comment and revise the response if necessary. 164. Response 43 It would be more responsive to refer the commenter to a section of a document where information can be found regarding "what is located at the site" regarding "extent of possible contamination sources." Corrective Action: Add a cite to the text to refer the commenter to a specific section(s) of a document where this information can be found. 165. Response 45 The information repositories are to contain all documentation concerning decision- making (even meeting minutes, as appropriate). Therefore, if the information repository contains only those documents listed in the Community Relations Plan, there is a probability that the commenter is correct in stating that the information repository may not be complete. Corrective Action: EPA is interested in discussing the content of the information repository with DDRW-Tracy. 166. Section 4.0, Remedial Design/Remedial Action Concerns It is not clear why there are no responses to the concerns presented in this section. The responsiveness summary should be responsive to all comments. Corrective Action: Provide complete responses to the concerns listed in this section. 167. Section 4.0.1 The text implies that DDRW-Tracy is a regulatory agency. Corrective Action: Revise the text. HAM Jane 7, 1993 40/40