My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sampling program and could look at 25 off-site wells , but not <br /> before the end of the third round of sampling . <br /> After much discussion it was agreed the wells to look at were <br /> those down or cross gradient . <br /> EPA expressed the opinion that DDRW-WB should be looking at <br /> these private wells (at least the contaminated ones) monthly. <br /> DDRW and the State RWQCB disagreed. <br /> The question of who was responsible for the carbon <br /> tetrachloride and chloroform in the Rose and Robertson wells <br /> came up . DDRW Tracy stated it does not feel it is responsible <br /> and that we have sufficient analytical data to support our <br /> claim. The question was asked of the regulators , 'Who is <br /> responsible to follow this up (carbon tet/chloroform <br /> pollution) ? ' State water said they would talk to the <br /> industrial site manager who has some sites due south of the <br /> Rose well , which might be responsible for the chloroform. <br /> No one had any idea where the carbon tet might have come from, <br /> although , it was suggested by DDRW Tracy that it may have <br /> emanated from above ground storage tanks at the tip of the DDRW <br /> triangle , in the old railroad town of Lyoth . <br /> Everyone expressed concern for the Rose ' s and Robertson ' s and <br /> it was suggested and agreed to that DDRW Tracy provide bottled <br /> water to the Rose ' s . DDRW Tracy said we would not at this time <br /> agree to provide bottled water for the Robertson ' s because this <br /> might set a legal precedent and make us responsible for the <br /> carbon tet and chloroform problems , but we would discuss this <br /> with our legal staff for a final decision . <br /> DDRW environmental staff asked if RWQCB would provide the <br /> information on the industrial sites south of the Rose ' s on <br /> Banta Road. RWQCB said it was public record data and DDRW-WB <br /> said we would get Woodward-Clyde to check it out . <br /> The EPA suggested that two quarters of data are not really <br /> representative of a trend as far as the plume goes ; everyone <br /> agreed we need more data. No one suggested a direct course of <br /> action to control the spread of the plume other than collecting <br /> more data. <br /> When asked , the County representatives said it should be <br /> possible to put extraction wells in on the highway (Banta Road) <br /> easement . <br /> The RWQCB agreed to take a couple more rounds of samples at the <br /> Rose and Robertson residences , but that would be the limit of <br /> their involvement . The EPA praised them for doing what they <br /> had already and felt they went above their requirements ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.