My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
figure." <br /> Please explain the anomalous groundwater depression in the vicinity of well <br /> LM059A (Figure A-8 in Appendix A) . <br /> Item 16. Specific Comments: The RTC states that " (N) There is no evidence <br /> indicating that the measurement at the well was erroneous, although it may be <br /> anomalous. A change in the contours if the elevation is not used would not <br /> have an impact on interpretations. Therefore, no revision was made to this <br /> figure." <br /> Please explain the anomalous groundwater mounding in the vicinity of well <br /> LM067B (Figure A-11 in Appendix A) . <br /> Item 17. Specific Comments: The RTC sates that " (N) Text provides adequate <br /> information regarding the use of 1995 data. For additional information, the <br /> reader should access the 1995 annual report." <br /> The EPA comment was not addressed. Please indicate what data quality problems <br /> occurred during all sampling events in 1995. <br /> Item 18. Specific Comments: The RTC states that "(N) Chloroform concentrations <br /> in samples from PWO03 are briefly addressed in Section 9.2.1.5. Because the <br /> chloroform concentrations are not attributable to DDJC-Tracy, the trend is not <br /> discussed in the annual report." <br /> The EPA comment was not addressed. It is unclear why concentrations in PWO03 <br /> are increasing. It appears that groundwater is flowing west in this area since <br /> Section 9.2.1.5 indicates that a source exists east of PW003. However, it is <br /> unknown in which horizon PWO03 is screened (Table 2.5-1) and consequently, <br /> what the flow direction is in this horizon. Please clarify this issue to <br /> eliminate the possibility that DDJC-Tracy is the source for the increased <br /> chloroform concentrations. <br /> Item 19. Specific Comments: The RTC states that "(N) Groundwater contours did <br /> not indicate the presence of capture zones at any extraction well. A note has <br /> been added to the legends indicating that no capture zones could be <br /> identified." <br /> It is unclear why no capture zones are depicted around operating extraction <br /> wells since groundwater extraction always creates a capture zone, even if only <br /> a very small one. Please explain whether the extraction wells are operating at <br /> their design capacity and meeting the data quality objectives which should <br /> include a determination of an acceptable radius of influence and dimensions of <br /> the capture zone around each well. Since every operating extraction well has <br /> an associated capture zone, please revise the figures to indicate a small <br /> capture zone around each operating extraction well. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.