My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:33:59 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:23:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sites in order to determine the existence and magnitude of environmental contamination as <br /> well as appropriate remedial actions. Currently there are 99 existing and two abandoned <br /> monitoring wells and seven piezometers. A plume of ground water contaminated with <br /> tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) extends approximately 2,000 feet off <br /> DDRW-Tracy property and approximately 140 feet deep. DDRW-Tracy is conducting <br /> investigative and remedial activities in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental <br /> Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments <br /> and Reauthorization Act (SARA) to the extent practical. Currently DDRW-Tracy is <br /> conducting an RI/FS and initiating groundwater cleanup through an Interim Remedial <br /> Measure (IRM). As part of the environmental program, DDRW-Tracy has established an <br /> electronic environmental data base, data evaluation software, and is conducting a quarterly <br /> groundwater monitoring program. Delivery Order 0002 was awarded to Montgomery <br /> Watson, formerly James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM), to conduct <br /> sampling under the Well Monitoring Program and Options 2, 3, and 4 have been activated <br /> to cover redevelopment activities for up to 43 monitoring wells which have historically <br /> yielded samples with high turbidity values or have accumulated sediment within the well <br /> casing. <br /> 2.3.0.2. Based on data collected during quarterly groundwater monitoring at DDRW- <br /> Tracy, it was determined that wells LM1 through LM43 were frequently yielding samples <br /> of relatively high turbidity and high concentrations of total metals. During the September <br /> 1992 round of well monitoring, a turbidity evaluation was conducted to assess the possible <br /> effects of high turbidity on analytical results. Wells LM15, LM16, LM25, LM26, and <br /> LM32 were sampled using both a bladder pump and a bailer to compare analytical results <br /> for samples obtained by each method. The bailed samples were significantly more turbid <br /> than the pumped samples. Based on the analytical results from the turbidity evaluation, it <br /> was determined that concentrations of total metals were much greater in the more turbid <br /> samples. All of the remaining wells from LMl through LM43 that were sampled during <br /> the September 1992 round (those wells not included in the turbidity evaluation) were <br /> sampled using a bladder pump. While sampling all wells, data was collected from purging <br /> activities to determine how turbidity was affected by the volume purged. A comparison of <br /> measured well depths to constructed well depths was also made to determine if sediment <br /> was accumulating within the well casings. <br /> 2.3.0.3. Samples with a turbidity of less than 5 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) <br /> could not be obtained from 13 wells. In addition, seven wells were identified which <br /> required purging more than 10 well volumes to obtain a sample with less than 5 NTU. It <br /> was recommended that these wells be given highest priority for redevelopment. these wells <br /> are listed in Table 1. <br /> 2.3.0.4. Table 2 lists all wells not already shown in Table 1 which had calculated <br /> sediment accumulations of more than one foot in the bottom of the casing. These wells <br /> required careful purging to achieve sample turbidities of less than 5 NTU. <br /> 2.3.0.5. Extensive purging was performed at well LM3, but low turbidity samples still <br /> could not be obtained. Based on observations made during field sampling, including the <br /> volume of water purged and the methods used, it was recommended that well LM3 be <br /> -2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.