My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:33:59 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:23:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Please, revise the Report to address the above-listed discrepancies and <br /> issues. <br /> 16. Figure A-8, Appendix A: The groundwater contours presented near LM059A <br /> indicate that the groundwater elevation measurement taken at LM059A was <br /> erroneous and should not be used for contouring groundwater flow. Please <br /> revise the Report to indicate why the data point was used or revise the <br /> figure to eliminate this data point (including a footnote explaining <br /> that this data point was not used for contouring) . <br /> 17. Figure A-11, Appendix A: The groundwater contours presented near LM067B <br /> indicate that the groundwater elevation measurement taken at LM067B was <br /> erroneous and should not be used for contouring groundwater flow. Please <br /> revise the Report to indicate why the data point was used or revise the <br /> figure to eliminate this data point (including a footnote explaining <br /> that this data point was not used for contouring) . <br /> 18. Section B.2.1.6, Page B-3, Appendix B: The Report states that "The 1995 <br /> data were excluded from the test because of potential data quality <br /> problems and results that appeared anomalous relative to other results <br /> for each well." However, no reasons are provided for why all of the 1995 <br /> data (from four sampling events?) appeared to be anomalous. For <br /> clarity, please revise the Report to indicate why all of the 1995 data <br /> appeared to have data quality problems. <br /> 19. Appendix C: The Report shows a chloroform time series plot for PWO03 <br /> showing an increasing trend in concentrations of chloroform at this <br /> private well. However, the Report does not discuss the source of <br /> chloroform and potential reasons for the increase in chloroform <br /> concentrations at PW003. Since increasing trends should be closely <br /> monitored and investigated, please revise the Report to discuss the <br /> increasing chloroform concentrations at this well. <br /> 20. Figures H-1 and H-2, Appendix H: The figures do not show capture zones <br /> although several extractions wells were operating. For clarity, please <br /> revise the figures to indicate the capture zones or provide an <br /> explanation in the legend for why no capture zones are shown in the <br /> figures (i.e. , insufficient pumping rates to create a capture zone) . <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.