Laserfiche WebLink
detector (PID: Thermo Environmental Instruments, Inc. 580A,`Tt -O e.V., calibrated to <br /> isobutylene) was used to monitor organic vapors during excavation procedures. <br /> Samples collected during the UST removal (Table 1) indicated that impacted soil was <br /> present only near the north end of the excavation. Therefore, excavation was concentrated <br /> only in this area. The UST excavation was deepened from a depth of approximately 16 feet <br /> to a depth of approximately 31 feet. The length and width of the excavation were not <br /> expanded significantly (see Figure 2). No groundwater was encountered during excavation. <br /> Soil was also removed from two areas near the original dispensers, immediately north and <br /> northeast of the former USTs. Near the former west dispenser island, soil was excavated <br /> to a depth of 9 feet. Near the former east dispenser island, soil was excavated to a depth <br /> of 8.5 feet. <br /> Excavated soil was stockpiled at the south end of the site; soil excavated during the UST <br /> removal was also moved to this area. Approximately 75 cubic yards of soil were removed <br /> from the excavation on Februaiy 6, 1995. <br /> 3.2 Soil Sample Collection and Analysis <br /> One soil sample was collected from the floor of the UST excavation; two soil samples were <br /> collected from the dispenser/piping areas. All samples were collected from the excavator <br /> bucket using a metric soil sampler. Soil samples were collected under the supervision of Mr. <br /> Ron Rowe of the San Joaquin County Public Health Services - Environmental Health <br /> Division (PHS/EHD). <br /> Samples \\,ere collected in clean, 2 by 3-inch brass sleeves. The ends of the sleeves were <br /> covered with aluminum sheets, capped and sealed with tape. The samples were stored on <br /> ice and transported under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical Inc. (MAI) in <br /> Pacheco. No soil samples were collected from the excavated soil. <br /> At the direction of the PHS/EHD, the samples were analyzed for total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH as gasoline) and BTE&X in accordance with EPA methods 8015ni and <br /> 8020, respectively. <br /> 4.0 FINDINGS <br /> TPH as gasoline was detected in sample NB-1, collected from the floor of the UST <br /> excavation, at 240 mg/kg (parts per million, ppm). Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and <br /> xylenes were also detected in sample NB-1 at concentrations of 0.12 ppm. 3.0 ppm, 1,5 ppm <br /> and 21 ppm, respectively. No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the samples from <br /> the dispenser areas. Analytical results are summarized on Table 2. The laboratory report <br /> and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix A. <br /> OW10 iui A,&Se mimes,Inc. [ <br /> SG95-0l-1076-0ZCOUNTRY MART/u rq J <br /> v <br />