Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET ORA NO. R5-2004-0028 20 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA, CITY OF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> DHS must revise the current total THMs MCL in Title 22 CCR to be as low or lower than the USEPA <br /> MCL. Total Trihalomethanes (THMs) include bromoform, bromodichloromethane, chloroform, and <br /> dibromochloromethane. Chloroform does not have promulgated CTR criteria. The State Board, in <br /> WQO No 2003-0002, stated that the Drinking Water Standard primary MCL for Total THMs of 80 <br /> ug/1 could be applied to address chloroform in the discharge regulated in that Order. In addition, the <br /> Cal/EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment(OEHHA)has published the Toxicity <br /> Criteria Database, which contains cancer potency factors for chemicals, including chloroform, that <br /> have been used as a basis for regulatory actions by the boards, departments and offices within <br /> Cal/EPA. This cancer potency factor is equivalent to a concentration in drinking water of 1.1 ug/1 <br /> (ppb) at the 1-in-a-million cancer risk level with the consumption of the drinking water over a 70-year <br /> lifetime. This risk level is consistent with that used by the Department of Health Services (DHS)to set <br /> de minimis risks from involuntary exposure to carcinogens in drinking water in developing MCLS and <br /> Action Levels and by OEHHA to set negligible cancer risks in developing Public Health Goals for <br /> drinking water. The one-in-a-million cancer risk level is also mandated by USEPA in applying human <br /> health protective criteria contained in the National Toxics Rule and the California Toxics Rule to <br /> priority toxic pollutants in California surface waters. <br /> MUN is a designated beneficial use of the receiving water. However, there are no known drinking <br /> water intakes on the San Joaquin River within several miles downstream of the discharge,and <br /> chloroform is a non-conservative pollutant. Therefore, to protect the MUN use of the receiving waters, <br /> the Regional Board finds that, in this specific circumstance, application of the USEPA MCL for total <br /> THMs for the effluent is appropriate, as long as the receiving water does not exceed the OEHHA <br /> cancer potency factor's equivalent receiving water concentration at a reasonable distance from the <br /> outfall (e.g.,before reaching the drinking water intakes). Effluent samples collected from January <br /> 2002 through December 2002 indicated that THMs were present with a maximum concentration of 17 <br /> ug/1 and an average concentration of 10 ug/l. Chloroform samples collected over the same period <br /> contained a maximum concentration of 12 ug/1 and an average concentration of 8 ug/l. Considering <br /> the available dilution based on the harmonic mean flow of the San Joaquin River,the discharge does <br /> not have a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above the water quality <br /> objective for MUN use by causing an exceedance of the USEPA primary MCL for total THMs or the <br /> chloroform OEHHA cancer potency factor's equivalent receiving water concentration. Therefore, <br /> effluent limitations for total THMs and chloroform are not included in this Order. <br /> 11.2.2 Effluent Limitations for Human Carcinogenic Priority Pollutants <br /> The effluent limitation calculation procedures in Section 1.4 of the SIP allow for the granting of a <br /> dilution credit which, in this case, is 222-fold based on the harmonic mean flow of the San Joaquin <br /> River at Vernalis and the average discharge flow. However,the Regional Board finds that granting of <br /> this dilution credit would allocate an unnecessarily large portion of the River's assimilative capacity <br /> for these constituents and could violate the Antidegradation Policy. Instead, effluent limitations have <br /> been developed based on the amount of dilution that would be required, such that receiving water <br /> concentrations for these constituents would be met when effluent concentrations are at estimated <br /> maximum levels as determined by taking the mean plus 3.3-standard deviations or the maximum <br /> observed concentration, which ever is larger, for data sets with 10 or more values. For data sets with <br />