Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET ORI&NO. R5-2004-0028 21 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA, CITY O LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> less than 10 values, the maximum effluent concentration and a 3.11 multiplier(from Table 5-2 of the <br /> TSD)provides the estimated maximum levels. The calculations of the allowed dilution are shown in <br /> Table 12 which: (1) summarizes the monitoring data for the human carcinogens that have reasonable <br /> potential to exceed human carcinogen criteria; (2) summarizes the statistics used in calculating the <br /> estimated maximum concentration; and, (3) determines the amount of dilution that would be required <br /> to meet the applicable human-carcinogen criteria. Final effluent limitations are calculated and <br /> summarized in Table 13. <br /> 11.2.3 Ability to Meet Effluent Limitations and Interim Requirements <br /> Based on historical effluent data, the WQCF can meet the effluent limitations for <br /> dibromochloromethane,bromodichloromethane, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. <br /> Additionally,because the plant will install a UV disinfection system by 1 February 2009,the THM <br /> constituents are expected to decrease significantly. <br /> Section 1.4.2.2.B of the SIP requires, among other things, that when a mixing zone/dilution credit is <br /> granted, the permit must specify the point in the receiving water where the applicable <br /> criteria/objectives must be met. The Discharger has not performed such an analysis over a variety of <br /> now conditions. However, considering the long-term averaging period for human carcinogens, the <br /> infrequency of critical conditions and worst-case effluent concentrations, and the fact that there are no <br /> drinking water intakes for numerous miles down- or up-stream of the discharge, the Regional Board <br /> finds the lack of a detailed mixing zone study is not significant enough to postpone the imposition of <br /> final effluent limitations for dibromochloromethane,bromodichloromethane, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol and <br /> bis (2-ethyhexyl)phthalate. <br /> 11.2.4 Receiving Water Monitoring for Human Carcinogen Priority Pollutants <br /> Receiving water monitoring of human carcinogens is required to provide assurance that water quality <br /> criteria are being met downstream of the discharge and that the beneficial use of municipal supply is <br /> being protected. Although a mixing zone analysis has not been performed to delineate the specific <br /> boundaries of the mixing zone for human carcinogens,the samples collected at the existing R-1 and R- <br /> 4 receiving water monitoring locations should provide adequate information to demonstrate <br /> compliance with water quality criteria. <br /> 11.3 Bioaccumulatives <br /> Based on information submitted by the Discharger, the Regional Board concludes that the discharge <br /> contains mercury. The Delta waterways are listed in accordance with Clean Water Act Section 303(d) <br /> as impaired for mercury based on bioaccumulation of this pollutant in fish tissue. The CTR contains <br /> criteria for mercury. The CTR criteria,however, do not address bioaccumu abutithe <br /> Th ever, <br /> WQCF effluent contains detectable levels of mercury below CTR priority pollutant <br /> the bioaccumulation rates in fish tissue used to calculate the CTR water quality criteria are based only <br /> on a laboratory derived bioconcentration factor that considers organism uptake from water only and <br /> does not consider the contribution from the organism's food source. Therefore,the CTR criteria are <br />