My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISTOPHER
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523929
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2019 10:47:55 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 10:22:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523929
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016100
FACILITY_NAME
WRP #1/ CITY OF LATHROP
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
CHRISTOPHER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19813035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 CHRISTOPHER WAY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 8 of 14 <br /> the paperwork that started this project. This is <br /> usually a problem for them to pay since they have <br /> mostly ended contract requirements with their <br /> clients... <br /> So I have MWs in disrepair and NO ONE to fix <br /> them...Utimately the landowner gets a serious letter <br /> from me or the DA. I'd like to not have things go that <br /> far. <br /> so please figure out what wells you need and what <br /> wells you don't. Talk to me about them. I don't <br /> care what you call them now or later. But I must <br /> know where they are and how they are built so <br /> eventually EHD can have them properly destroyed <br /> when NOT needed. i treat ALL wells like RCRA <br /> ('cradle to grave'accountability). <br /> I will be trying to match each well to a borelog and a <br /> location. Eventually, we all will decide which ones <br /> you want and don't want and go from there. <br /> thanks again. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: umezaki, dave <br /> [mailto:dumezaki@EKICONSULT.COM] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:13 <br /> AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: jlfio@hydrofocus.com; tarantino, steve; <br /> ggibson@ci.lathrop.ca.us <br /> Subject: RE: Well Maps [Item 3 of 3] <br /> Mike, <br /> We can talk further about this next week. <br /> I'm guessing that this might be too much <br /> information for your purposes, i.e., you may <br /> or may not care what Regional Board <br /> permit each well is connected to- maybe all <br /> you care about is who the responsible party is <br /> for each well, how and when it was <br /> constructed, how and when it's going to be <br /> destroyed, etc. But again, we can discuss <br /> next week. <br /> --Dave Umezaki, EKI <br /> From: Gregory Gibson <br /> [mailto:ggibson@ci.lathrop.ca.us] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:03 <br /> AM <br /> To: umezaki, dave; Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc:jlfio@hydrofocus.com; tarantino, steve; <br /> Cary Keaten; jzilles@kleinfelder.com <br /> Subject: RE: Well Maps [Item 3 of 3] <br /> 9/26/2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.