My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHURCH
>
800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524783
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 2:51:36 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 2:47:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524783
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0016638
FACILITY_NAME
NEWARK PAPERBOARD MILL
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHURCH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14523004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
800 W CHURCH ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> u <br /> ' Site Name and Location: Newark Sierra Paperboard Corp.(Gold Bond)800 W.Church St., Stockton, San Joaquin Co. <br /> 0 1.Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and <br /> other uses within 2000 feet of the site; N <br /> 0 2 Sffg magmas ale of area impacted�howi g loc tions of farmer and_misting tank sysfems_ 6 product tanks and 2 waste <br /> x v i ! i ri i w l ! i ink and solvent tanks F <br /> removed in 8/85 MW for <br /> gradients and nearby surface waters. buildings, streets,and subsurface utilities; I <br /> present tanks, only. <br /> Y 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; Silty clay to 20 ft bgs <br /> N❑ 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); Stockpiled soil bac lied into pit amount and <br /> contamination in soil unknown <br /> 4 wells on-site are used to ml <br /> Y. 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; wenitor 210,000-gallon vertical tank. <br /> I�. h <br /> ❑ 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water, 1/97 8-9 ft bgs i <br /> 1985 20 ft bgs <br /> I <br /> Y Tests were for TPH and BTEX. Tests need to be for the tank contents <br /> ❑ 7.Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: and the byproducts of jthe tank contents. Need to sample native and <br /> Y❑Detection limits for confirmation sampling stockpiled soil used for backfill. <br /> ❑N Lead analysesFNJ hr <br /> 8.Concentracontours of contaminants found and(hose remaining in,s2rl EPA Methods 8260 and 8270 need to be <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: il; used to analyze soil and groundwater <br /> N Lateral and N Vertical extent of soil contamination II samples to detect tank chemicals and their <br /> 'i weathered byproducts. } <br /> N Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination . <br /> 8 I� <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for su <br /> NAbsurface <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and <br /> groundwater remedia tion system; I' <br /> 0 10.Reports/information FYI Unauthorized Release Form 1/20/87 OQMRs(Dates) <br /> Y ❑6 Other(nport name) Solvent Tank Site Closure 10/17/97 <br /> Welland boring logs PARE]UST Sampling Results 11/26/8 S <br /> FN11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT,, Removed tanks, but did not sample for the <br /> 14 correct chemicals <br /> Did not determine extent of contamination. May have <br /> 7N12.Reasons why background wasris unattainable using BAT, backfilled pit with contaminated soil. <br /> d <br /> ❑ 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining; r <br /> 0 14.Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk <br /> y <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling, 3 k <br /> 0 15.Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely <br /> is impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses;and h <br /> 13 <br /> Q 16.WET or TCLP results <br /> f. <br /> ByAf�_ <br /> Comments: Need to sample native and backfilled soil and groundwater using EPA Methods 8260 <br /> By- <br /> and 8270. Report all.peaks. <br /> Dat : <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.