My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHURCH
>
800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516614
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 3:43:11 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 3:23:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0516614
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012708
FACILITY_NAME
NEWARK SIERRA PAPERBOARD/ RECYCLING
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHURCH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14523004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
800 W CHURCH ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NN,. %W e' <br /> Dopaco, Inc. - 2 - 18 September 2012 <br /> 800 W. Church St., Stockton <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> The following table shows the CPT-MIP-2012-13 groundwater sample results by depth <br /> and tolueneNOCs concentrations in micrograms per Liter (ug/L). <br /> Depth Toluene 2-Butanone 4-Meth -2 Pentanone Acetone <br /> 18.5' 410,000 <63,000 <63,000 <63,000 <br /> 32'-33' 510,000 74,000 250,000 <71,000 <br /> 32'-33' 500,000 170,000 340,000 110,000 <br /> 1 =duplicate sample <br /> The grab groundwater sampling location for CPT-2012-13 was moved 5' to the south of <br /> that actual MIP/CPT boring location, due to an obstruction on the surface. The Report <br /> stated that the discrepancy between the MIP toluene results (<1 ppm) and the <br /> maximum groundwater toluene results (510 ppm) was due to the fine grained lithology <br /> above 35' below ground surface (bgs) causing the highly localized distribution of the <br /> toluene in the subsurface. All calibrations of the MIP sensors showed proper <br /> functioning before and after testing for each CPT location. A 2005 soil and groundwater <br /> investigation reported toluene in a grab groundwater sample at 6,800,000 ug/L at B-1, <br /> which is shown on the Report Figure 5 as approximately 10' north-northwest of <br /> CPT-MIP-2012-13. Of the remaining CPT/MIP grab groundwater sample toluene <br /> results located near CPT-MIP-2012-13, toluene was only detected at CPT-MIP-2012-14 <br /> (34 ug/I, 37'-38' bgs) at 5' south, and CPT-MIP-2012-15 (1 ug/I at 32.5'-33.5' bgs) at 25' <br /> south. The groundwater data from the Report and previous investigations data show <br /> that the groundwater plume is defined to the north, west, and east of CPT-MIP-2012-13. <br /> The subsurface geology was determined by CPT logs and detailed in geologic cross <br /> sections, which showed fine grained sediments (silts and clays) from surface down to a <br /> coarse grained sediment (sand) starting at 33' bgs (CPT-MIP-2012-13) and extending <br /> down to 42' bgs (9' thick). The sand (permeable zone) thins to 3' thick (38' bgs to 41' <br /> bgs) at 20' to the west (CPT-MIP-2012-11), expands to 8' thick (36' to 43' bgs) at <br /> CPT-MIP-2012-14, and to 10' thick (33' to 45' bgs) at CPT-MIP-2012-15. The Report <br /> and previous investigations logs show the sand pinches out to the west and east of the <br /> source area. Groundwater flow direction was not calculated by the grab sample <br /> borings. <br /> The Report states toluene is limited in lateral extent and the groundwater sampling <br /> shows as little as 5' laterally may be the difference between impacts in groundwater in <br /> the source area and non-detects in soils based on the MIP. The Report recommends <br /> the following wells be installed and screened from 30' to 35' bgs, due to the Report's <br /> 58% success rate in finding water above 30' bgs (The Workplan recommended <br /> screening across first water previously detected between 15' to 20' bgs). <br /> Well Location Possible Flow Direction Nearest boring <br /> DMW-1 35'west of source area upgradient CPT-MIP-2012-11 <br /> DMW-2 45' east of source area downgradient Geos ntec 6 2011 <br /> DMW-3 80' southwest of source area downgradient to crossgradient CPT-MIP-2012-16 <br /> DMW-4 60' south of source area crossgradient CPT-MIP-2012-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.