Laserfiche WebLink
27 October 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 96-0235 <br /> Page 2 of l 1 <br /> On 06 April 2005 Mc Campbell Analytical Inc. (MAI) was delivered five brass core tubes and <br /> 2 liters of unpreserved aquifer water,in addition to other preserved containers of aquifer water. The <br /> weight of the soil was determined to be 1.1 kilograms (kg), this allowed only one sample and one <br /> sample spike each consisting of 500 grams. A volume of 500 milliliters (ml)of aquifer water were <br /> used in each experiments. The soil was quickly manually homogenized and soil aliquots prepared <br /> for testing.Five experiment reaction vessels contained the sample and quality control/assurance were <br /> set up with and the remaining 5 vessels contained 500 ml de-ionized water for flow control purpose. <br /> The sample and QC/A vessels each contained 500g of soil and 500ml of aquifer water that were <br /> gently shaken for 30 minutes prior to purging. The QC/A sample spike vessels were treated like the <br /> sample except that it was spiked with 100 milligram (mg) of K2Cr2O7 which is equal 71 parts per <br /> million(ppm)of Cr". The blank was just 500m1 de-ionized water. QC/A spike contains 500ml de- <br /> ionized water and spiked with 100mg of K2Cr2O7 which is equal 71 ppm of Cr". <br /> Oxygen flow was initially set at 10 psi at the main regulator. Oxygen gas flowed to the ozone <br /> generator whose channel A and channel B were both set at 5 psi. The ozone flow from the ozone <br /> generator was directed to a glass splitter via Teflon tubing and then split into each vessel. The ozone <br /> gas exited from each vessel into an ozone scrubber that catalytically (no reactive chemicals) <br /> decomposed the 03. Purging continued for 5 days. All tubing and connections were Teflon or glass <br /> from the ozone generator to this point. The purge flow was monitored at the end of the scrubber <br /> outlet and tubing was restricted here to control the flow. <br /> The attached table demonstrates Ozone generating parameters. <br /> Experimental Measurements of Oxygen Head Pressure and Ozone Flow <br /> Time of Head Ozone Flow Measured at Scrubber Outlet (ml/min) <br /> Measurement Pressure Sample MS MB LCS LCSD <br /> Initial: 8 pm, 4/6/05 10lf 60 60 56 54 58 <br /> Day 1: 5 pm, 4/7/5 13 43 48 58 56 59 <br /> Day 2: 5 pm, 4/8/5 15 42 45 50 48 50 <br /> Da 5: 6 m 4/11/5 18 13 13 24 26 26 <br /> As reaction time progressed oxygen feed pressure nearly doubled but flows dropped two fold or <br /> more indicating that the system became"more restricted". This is easy to understand for the vessels <br /> that contained soil, but there is no definite explanation for those that contained only water. It is <br /> possible that condensed water in the ozone scrubbers is responsible. Comparison of this data with <br /> the ozone determinations shows that dissolved ozone concentration actually increases with lower <br /> flow rates, perhaps indicating that "self-purging" is significant. Dissolved ozone concentrations <br /> ranged from 0.029 - 0.066 milligram per liter(mg/L) and are tabulated in the results section. <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc. <br />