Laserfiche WebLink
27 October 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 96-0235 <br /> Page 3 of 11 <br /> The"Medial"sampling(during the 5 days of ozonation)was accomplished via a sipper tube that was <br /> immersed below the upper level of the aqueous phase and was accessed by disconnecting the <br /> reaction vessel outlet tubing and withdrawing 20-30 ml of sample via a luer tipped syringe. Ozone <br /> flow was stopped during sampling. Generally 20ml of water was removed each time resulting in a <br /> 60/500 or 12%decrease in fluid volume.This factor has not been taken into account in the analytical <br /> data. <br /> At the end of Day 5,the ozone flow was permanently stopped.A Final Water and Final soil samples <br /> were withdrawn. The Final soil was found contain 1 /0.8 = 125%more water than the Initial soil. <br /> This correction factor was significant_ for TTLC trace metals and this correction factor was applied <br /> to TTLC Final soil metals values.A significant volume of water was removed for the Final water <br /> tests and approximately 200m1 of de-ionized water was added to the sample for decay studies.Ozone <br /> and hexachrome were measured for another 8 days. Approximately 20-30m1 sample aliquots were <br /> withdrawn between 3 and 5 pm on each day from 12 April to 19 April. A syringe aliquot was <br /> withdrawn in the same way as for the medial samples. <br /> OBSERVATIONS, INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> General <br /> VIEW Overall,pH increased from 7.89 to 8.3,while alkalinity, TDS, EC,& Ca+2 decreased in the aquifer <br /> water. These effects are consistent with the pptn of CaCO3 in response to the pH increase. The <br /> degassing of COz,gas, is probably the dominant reaction that causes pH to increase. These <br /> precipitation reactions as well as those of Fe and Mn oxides will diminish permeability,although the <br /> extent and hence significance is not known. Note that the Initial soil pH = 8.94 measured on de- <br /> ionized water in equilibrium with the soil is very different from the pH=7.89 of the aquifer water. <br /> Water Quglily <br /> With regard to other water quality parameters, chloride was conserved, as expected. Sulfate <br /> increased moderately from 130 to 160 mg/L,perhaps due to reactions except with sulfate as the end <br /> product. Unexpectedly, ORP decreased from 419 to 217 my with ozonation, perhaps because the <br /> significantly increased dissolved hydrocarbons now control the redox potential. <br /> Hydrocarbons AND VOCs <br /> Good agreement is generally found between 8260 and 8020/8021 for MBTEX hydrocarbons except <br /> for the initial soil values. The data were double checked and no errors were found, extraction <br /> surrogate recoveries agreed with stated dilution factors,so the explanation for this defaults to sample <br /> in-homogeneity. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />