Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 09 January 1998 <br /> • <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0235 <br />' Page 4 of 6 <br /> F <br /> during grading operations at the site Approximately 0 90 feet of well casing was removed On 18 <br />' December 1997, the elevation of each monitoring well casings was surveyed relative to a City of <br /> Stockton bench mark Surveying was performed by Mr Terry Piazza of Baumback-Piazza The <br /> survey sheet is included in Appendix C Revised casing'elevations were used to recalculate all <br /> ground water elevations, ground water elevations for MW-2 prior to May 1997 reflect the <br /> recalculated casing elevation prior to alteration _ <br /> 4.0. FINDINGS , <br /> 1 41 GROUNDWATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION ` <br />' The elevation of ground water in each well was calculated by subtracting the ground water depth <br /> from the surveyed casing elevations Depths to ground water ranged from 22 14 feet to 23 55 feet <br /> below the well casings Ground water elevations at the site ranged from -15 43 feet in MW-4 to <br />' - 16 26 feet in MW-1 <br />' The revised well casing elevations were used to recalculate the ground water flow direction for 27 <br /> May 1997 as well as the current data The flow direction was complex for both monitoring events, <br /> as a trough of lower elevation ground water cuts diagonally, northwest/southeast across the property <br />' as indicated by the low ground water elevation in MW-I'and MW-2, causing all flow directions on <br /> the property to be toward MW-1 and MW-2 The trough dipped toward the northwest during the <br /> May 1997 monitoring event and toward the southeast during the November 1997 monitoring event <br />' The contoured ground water flow elevations for the May and November 1997 �giound water <br /> monitoring events are depicted in Figure's 4 and 5 The revised casing elevations did not significantly <br /> alter the observed ground water gradient for the May 1997 monitoring event <br />' - The ground water gradient and flow direction for all monitoring events were recalculated using MW- <br /> 1, MW-2 and MW-3 with the revised casing elevations All ground water elevations and gradients <br />' are summarized on Table 4 The calculated gradient direction for the March 1995 monitoring event <br /> does not match those calculated during the remaining monitorings The data for MW-3 may be in <br />' error, as the change in ground water elevation does not appear to match that of MW-Vaud MW-2 <br /> If an error of one foot is considered,,the gradient and flow direction more closely match those <br /> measured during the remaining monitoring events <br /> 42 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF WATER SAMPLES <br />' TPH-g was detected in MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations of 820 parts per billion (ppb, <br /> measured as micrograms per liter), 18,000 ppb and 53 ppb, respectively Benzene was detected in <br />' Advanced GeoEnN ironmentai,line <br /> r <br />