Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> 10 March 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0235 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />' 2 2 COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER-SAMPLES, <br /> r <br /> Water samples were collected from each purged well using new disposable plastic bailers Each <br />' water sample was transferred into 40-m1 VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a ' <br /> sample preservative and into 1-liter amber bottles without preservative After collection, the samples <br /> were properly labeled, placed in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to -� <br /> McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI), a State of California Department of Health Services (DHS)- <br /> certified analytical laboratory, and were analyzed for <br />' Notal petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and as diesel (TPH-d) in , <br /> accordance with EPA Methods 5030 and 8015m, <br /> Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) <br />' with methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 6021$020, and for <br /> h <br /> • Fuel oxygenates di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), MTBE, <br />' tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME) and tertiary butanol (TBA) in accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8260 Modified <br /> lieA <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> IGround water elevation and flow direction were calculated from field data, hydrocarbon-impact to <br /> ground water was inferred from laboratory analysis of the ground water samples Field observations, <br />' results of laboratory analysis of ground water samples and a discussion of data collected during field <br /> work follows _ <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION k <br />' The casing elevation of each well was previously surveyed relative to a City of Stockton bench mark <br /> The elevation of ground water In each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to ground water <br /> from the surveyed casing elevations (Table 1) Depths to ground water ranged from 16 97 feet to r <br />' 19 12 feet below the'tops of the well casings Ground water elevations at the site ranged from -10 94 <br /> feet in MW-4 to -12 69 feet mean sea level (MSL) in MW-2 Ground water elevation increased 0 94 , <br />' feet in MW-6B, ground water elevation,increased an average of 0 20 feet in the remaining wells <br /> To infer ground water flow direction, the ground water elevation data was divided into two sets <br /> I based on the well screen intervals Ground water was between 20 9 and 23 0 feet above the screened <br /> intervals in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-6B, MW-8B and MW-9, comprising the deeper <br /> water data set Ground water was within the screened intervals for monitoring wells MW-4, MW-5, <br /> c <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> i <br /> , s <br />