Laserfiche WebLink
1 i <br /> i � <br /> Project No. E6576.001 �� <br /> ►tional Groundwater Sampling/W. Clover 22 March 1995 <br /> I <br /> r determined downgradient direction from B-2, appeared to penetrate only shallow fill, with <br /> 4.� native soils below 2 feet. A grab sample of water was taken from B-3. MW-4 was then <br /> located five feet in the downgradient direction from B-3. <br /> L <br /> MW-4 was drilled the same day (October 17, 1994) to a depth of 25 feet, with soil <br /> samples taken every 5 feet below 10 feet. Groundwater was first encountered at 14 feet during <br /> the drilling, which was done with an auger drill rig utilizing 8-inch diameter hollow-stem flight <br /> g g <br /> augers. Details regarding the geology and as-built installation are given in Figures 6 and 12, <br /> Appendix A. No evidence of hydrocarbon contamination was observed during the drilling and <br /> installation of MW-4. The location of MW-4 was then surveyed by a licensed civil engineer <br /> C, with well collar elevation determined to 0.01 feet. The four soil samples were transported in <br /> a chilled cooler to a State-certified laboratory for testing. The ends of the 2"x4" cylindrical <br /> brass retainers were covered with aluminum foil, capped with polyethylene lids, and taped with <br /> �+ duct tape. <br /> Well Development: <br /> MW-4 was developed on 10/19/94 by bailing with a re-usable teflon bailer. Recharge <br /> capacity was high, with minimal water level drop. Approximately 10 casing volumes (30 <br /> gallons) were removed. Turbidity, which was moderate, appeared to decrease. slightly after <br /> ' about 25 gallons were bailed. Purge water was a light reddish brown color, similar to that <br /> obtained from MW-2, but in contrast with light-grey purge water from MWA and MW-3. <br /> L <br /> r Sampling: <br /> L <br /> On 10/21/94, MW-1, 2, and 3, were re-sampled in the company of Steve Sasson (PHS- <br /> r EHD) and MW-4 was sampled following purging and after pH, conductivity, and temperature <br /> had stabilized. At least three well volumes were removed during purging. Details of the <br /> sampling event are given in Appendix B. For each well, samples were collected in one 1-liter <br /> amber jar and two 40-m1 glass volatile organic analysis ("VOA") vials with Teflon septums <br /> as specified by the RWQCFB and EPA. All sample containers were new. The samples were <br /> accompanied from the field to the laboratory by a chain-of-custody and analysis request form, <br /> copies of which are given in Appendix C. Prior to sampling, water levels were measured. <br /> Page 4 <br /> TERRASEARCH, INC. <br />