Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM 46 <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD • CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> 3443 Routier Road ATSS: 8-495-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 <br /> TO: Gary Reents, Senior Engineer FROM: David Brent, Project Engineer <br /> DATE: 25 May 1989 SIGNATURE: � � _- <br /> SUBJECT: SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPE LINE, HOLT RECOVERY SITE, SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY <br /> On 3 May 1989 I met with Walter Risch of Southern Pacific Pipe Line <br /> Company (SPPL) and Fred Moss of Levine Fricke Consulting Engineers. <br /> The meeting resulted in the agreement of a time schedule for the <br /> cleanup of petroleum compounds in the ground water. We also <br /> discussed metals <br /> cady oil <br /> site and how that mayP <br /> affect PL' srng mud <br /> disposal site efforts <br /> The meeting started with SPPL requesting that we refer to the project <br /> as the "Holt Petroleum Recovery Site" instead of "SP/Arcady" since <br /> that implicates SPPL with Arcady Oil. The SPPL pipeline break is <br /> only related to the Arcady Oil site because of the location of the <br /> break and I agreed to refer to the project as requested by SPPL. We <br /> have treated the two projects separately in the past and such a name <br /> change is consistent with our handling of the project. <br /> We then began talking about a time schedule for the cleanup of the <br /> gasoline and jet fuel constituents polluting the ground water as a <br /> result of the February 1986 pipeline break. I stated that SPPL still <br /> had not completed defining the dissolve plume and that only a <br /> conceptual interim plan had been received to date. We discussed the <br /> following in detail: <br /> 1) The RWD submitted for an NPDES discharge of the treated <br /> groundwater was not adequate and an amendment would be <br /> required to enable us to write a permit. I referenced our <br /> 27 April 1989 letter and discussed the details that needed <br /> to be included to complete the RWD. <br /> 2) I brought up the fact that they may run into problems with <br /> an NPDES permit because of metals in the ground water from <br /> the Arcady drilling mud site. We agreed that SPPL will <br /> sample monitoring wells and potential receiving waters <br /> (Trapper Slough) for metals as part of the amended RWD. <br /> I will split samples for analysis at our laboratory, if <br /> possible. <br /> 3) I explained that the plume had not be defined nor had <br />