My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COPPEROPOLIS
>
10848
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536777
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 11:38:10 AM
Creation date
6/18/2019 11:11:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0536777
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021126
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER COUNTRYSIDE MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
10848
STREET_NAME
COPPEROPOLIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
10311006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
10848 COPPEROPOLIS RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
标签
EHD - Public
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
011 0 <br /> Former Countryside Market, Stockton,California <br /> Feasibility Study and Interim Remedial Action Plan May 20,2013 <br /> by the collection of background data. Each AS well will be tested individually at various injection rates <br /> followed by testing both injection wells simultaneously with primary observa ion points OBS-1 and MW-2 <br /> being monitored for target parameters during all of tests along with the collection of influence data from <br /> these wells and secondary observation points MW-1, MW-3, MW-4 and MW-5. <br /> Sparging is expected to increase dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrationE to levels that will promote <br /> aerobic biodegradation and achieve significant petroleum-hydrocarbon reductions in groundwater and <br /> saturated soil. Sparge testing will be completed using air to test the fea ibility of gas delivery to the <br /> subsurface. However, the final remedial alternative may include oxygen lsparging to further enhance <br /> biodegradation in the subsurface. The results of the sparge test can also be used to design an oxygen <br /> sparging system as it has been shown that oxygen flow in the subsurface is similar to air flow, including <br /> depth to water(DTW), pressure, PID and DO/oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) readings. <br /> Completion of the sparge testing will include groundwater well gauging, grc undwater sampling (pre- and <br /> post-test samples), vapor sampling (pre- during-, and post-test samples), PID measurements, and test <br /> measurements of air injection pressures, flow rates, vadose pressure, water levels, DO and ORP <br /> measurements to evaluate whether the Site is amenable to sparging and if VOCs are stripped from the <br /> groundwater. <br /> 5.1.5 Sparge Test and Monitoring Equipment <br /> The following sparge test equipment will likely be installed near each i jection point for the test: air <br /> compressor, desiccant dryer (used to remove oil/water), oil/water coalescing filter, pressure regulator, <br /> valves, pressure gauges, temperature gauge, air hose, and Dwyer® Ser'es VF Visi-Float® scfm flow <br /> meters. Each injection well head will be fitted with a ball valve, as wells pressure and temperature <br /> gauges. A 1-inch flexible compressed air hose equipped with a pressure�egulator, ball valve, and flow <br /> meter will lead from the compressor to the sparge wells. A portable, con4truction-rated air compressor <br /> will likely be used for testing. <br /> Monitoring equipment during the testing will likely include modified well caps with sample ports, In-Situ, <br /> Inc. Troll® 9500 multi probe data loggers (or equivalent), a YSI Model 58 or Horiba U22XD field DO <br /> sensor, a Rae Systems Mini-Rae 2000 PID, a 200-foot water level meter, and magnehelic <br /> pressure/vacuum gauges of differing ranges. <br /> 5.1.6 Breakthrough and Step Testing <br /> After conducting pre-test sampling and monitoring/shakedown of the equipment, sparge testing will <br /> commence by initiating air flow into the injection wells. Injection air pressure will be increased <br /> incrementally at an approximate rate of 2 psi per minute to determine the breakthrough pressure required <br /> to induce air flow into the injection wells. Flow rate versus pressure s ep testing will be performed <br /> immediately after breakthrough is established. The injection airflow wil be manually increased and <br /> associated injection pressure increases will be measured. <br /> Feasibility Study and lFeasibiliy Study BlW Text Final.dw 5-5 The Source Group,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.