Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Harry Galles -2- 26 December 1990 <br /> 5. Finding 6 has been changed to show a design flow from the ground water <br /> treatment system (GWTS) of 200 gallons per minute (gpm) (288,000 gallons <br /> per day (gpd)) . Although this figure was listed on Form 2D of the NPDES <br /> permit application as "average flow" , your 19 December 1990 letter states <br /> the average flow actually will be 60 gpm (86,400 gpd) . This average flow <br /> also has been listed in Finding 6. The finding also has been clarified to <br /> state that LLNL expects to achieve nondetectable levels of volatile <br /> organic compounds (VOCs) in the effluent as stated in the 19 December 1990 <br /> letter. <br /> Effluent Limitations <br /> 6. The effluent limits have been changed to monthly median and da, l,, maximum <br /> values. Although the monitoring program requires only monthly sampling <br /> after three months, LLNL is free to take more samples. If only one sample <br /> is taken per month, the monthly median will have to be met in that sample. <br /> 7. We know of many analytical laboratories that routinely achieve a detection <br /> limit of 0.5 ug/1 using EPA Methods 601 and 602. Therefore, we have <br /> retained 0.5 ug/1 as a 30-day median, but have added a daily maximum of <br /> 5 ug/l for any one VOC with the provision that the total VOCs in any one <br /> sample not exceed 5 ug/l . As noted above, if LLNL samples the effluent <br /> only once a month, that sample may contain no more than 0.5 ug/1 . These <br /> limits are consistent with other GWTS permits in our region for VOCs and <br /> are based on the physical ability of air strippers to remove VOCs <br /> effectively. <br /> 8. Item A.2 has been clarified to state the concentration of any VOC in the <br /> discharge other than those listed in Item A.1 may not be more than 0.5 <br /> u9/1 . <br /> 9. In Item A.3, I have retained the pH range of 6.5 to 8.5 to meet the water <br /> quality objectives for inland surface waters in the Board' s Water Quality <br /> Control Plan. An occasional excursion above 8.5 in the effluent will not <br /> be cause for enforcement action. If you still want a higher pH limit, you <br /> will have to provide sufficient data to shoe: the higher limit is needed <br /> and will not cause a water quality problem. y <br /> 10. In Item A.4, the average daily dry weather flow limit has been changed to <br /> 86,400 gpd to reflect the new proposed average flow rate of 60 gpm. <br /> 11. Item A.7, which contained effluent toxicity limits, has been deleted. <br /> Receiving Water Limitations <br /> 12. Turbidity has been added to the monitoring program to measure compliance <br /> with Item B.7. <br /> Provisions <br /> 13. Provision C.2 which contained the compliance time schedule for various <br /> investigations has been deleted since an FFA is being negotiated. <br />