Laserfiche WebLink
' k' ■ K L E I NE ELDER <br /> ' CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' The analytical results for the soil samples collected at the site were compared to the California <br /> Code of Regulations 22CCR§66261.24 and/or the Residential and Industrial U.S. EPA Region <br /> IX Preliminary Remediation Goals (DRGs), dated November 1, 2000. A summary of <br /> Kleinfelders observations, findings and comparison of analytical results to these regulations and <br /> goals (as applicable) are summarized below: <br /> 1) Field observations indicate that discolored soil with petroleum odors were removed from the <br /> ' sidewalls of Excavation LEC. Analytical confirmation sampling along the eastern and <br /> northern sidewalls as part of this assessment also indicate both purgeable and extractable <br /> hydrocarbons were not present in the sidewall samples collected. BTEX compounds were <br /> ' also not present from soil samples collected in the northern and eastern sidewall samples with <br /> the exception of xylenes, which was detected at a concentration of 7.7 µg/kg in a eastern <br /> sidewall sample at a depth of 7 feet bgs. <br /> 2) Field observations also indicate that discolored soil with petroleum odors were removed from <br /> the sidewalls and bottom of Excavation SE-D. Analytical results show that both purgeable <br /> ' hydrocarbons and BTEX constituents were not present in sidewall and bottom samples <br /> collected within SE-D. A single extractable hydrocarbon TPH-D was detected at 2.2 mg/kg <br /> in a sample collected from a north sidewall sample at a depth of approximately 2-1/2 feet <br /> ' bgs. No other extractable hydrocarbons were otherwise detected in soil samples collected in <br /> SE-D. <br /> ' 3) The location of the newley assessed area SE-D is located south of LE-C on proposed Lot 22. <br /> This location is also in close proximity and appears to transect a fonner soil excavation of six <br /> diesel USTs. <br /> ' 4) The concentrations of totals xylenes and TPH-D detected in this limited soil assessment in <br /> Kleinfelder's opinion would not generally trigger requirements for additional investigation or <br /> ' cleanup from local or State agencies. <br /> ' S) Four of five metals analyzed for including Cr, Pb, Ni and Zn were detected in each of the <br /> fourteen soil samples collected in excavations LE-C and SE-D. The total metal <br /> concentrations detected were found to be below the California Code of Regulation hazardous <br /> ' waste criteria as expressed in 22CCR §66261.24. Total metal results were also below <br /> residential PRGs levels for soil. In Kleinfelder's opinion the metal concentrations detected in <br /> the soil samples collected in this assessment are reflective of naturally occurring background <br /> ' levels. <br /> 6) Based upon the analytical results within this report Kleinfelder does not recommend further <br /> sampling or remediation in the two areas LE-C and SE-D discussed within this addendum <br /> report. However if additional soil staining or unusual odors are noted during construction <br /> 20-4341-1I.EOI/201IL635 Page 5 of 8 <br /> Copyright 2001 Kleinfelder,Inc. September 24,2001 <br /> 1 <br />