My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTRY CLUB
>
1876
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542421
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2019 12:25:09 PM
Creation date
6/21/2019 10:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0542421
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0024377
FACILITY_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB BLVD/295950
STREET_NUMBER
1876
STREET_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12319101
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1876 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CURRENT AND HISTORICAL DEPTH TO WATER <br /> The current and historical depth to water at the site both have considerable impact on the <br /> extent of soil and groundwater contamination and the efforts to investigate and remediate <br /> it. Groundwater elevations were considerably lower during the operation of the UST at <br /> the site than the present, creating the potential for deeper zones of impacted soil. The <br /> current high groundwater levels, however, prevent the effective use of vapor extraction to <br /> remove this secondary source of contamination. <br /> WEGE used historical groundwater elevations recorded at selected wells in the site <br /> vicinity by the California DWR, the San Joaquin County Flood Control District, and <br /> California Water Services to determine the historical groundwater elevation minimum at <br /> the site for the years 1965 -1999. A review of this data shows the interval September 15 <br /> through October 15, 1977 to coincide with the lowest groundwater elevations for the <br /> majority of the wells. The elevations at each well (in feet above mean sea level) for the <br /> period September 15 through October 15 1977 were plotted on a base map provided by <br /> the San Joaquin County Flood Control District and used to establish five foot <br /> groundwater elevation contour intervals (See Figure 5). Figure 5 shows the site to be <br /> located at the -35 foot groundwater elevation contour interval, indicating that the top of <br /> groundwater reached a maximum depth (minimum elevation) of 40 feet below ground <br /> surface (bgs). WEGE's investigation of March 26, 1998 included the collection of <br /> hydropunch samples to 45 feet bgs. TPH-G, BTEX, and MTBE groundwater <br /> contamination, but no soil contamination was observed in these lower samples. Future <br /> monitor wells at the site should include provisions to sample groundwater to a maximum <br /> depth of 40 feet bgs. <br /> Effective use of vapor extraction requires that the groundwater levels remain below the <br /> zone of contaminated soil. The top of contaminated soil at the site begins somewhere <br /> between 10 and 15 feet bgs. Table 1 shows the measured depth (from top of well casing) <br /> to the top of groundwater at monitor well MW1 from April 1993 to the most recent <br /> quarterly measurement on March 3, 1999. The groundwater elevation shows a steady <br /> increase over the six-year period, reaching a current level of 8.24 feet below the top of <br /> casing (approximately 8.5 feet bgs). The last time the top of groundwater was deeper <br /> than 15 feet bgs was in December of 1977. The long-term trend towards an increase in <br /> groundwater elevation in the site vicinity makes it unlikely that groundwater will recede <br /> to levels that would provide efficient use of vapor extraction as a remedial alternative <br /> anytime in the near future. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.