Laserfiche WebLink
be any domestic wells in the vicinity of this site, there are <br /> ' groundwater monitoring wells located on Country Club Drive to the <br /> east and west of the property. <br /> ' PRIOR USE OF PROPERTY„ <br /> The property had been a commercial gasoline station for roam <br />' years; it ceased business as such sometime during the 1970 s; <br /> actual dates are not known. There is no information concerning <br /> the installation of the UST 's, and no records are available on <br /> volumes used or inventory reconcilliation. Since the closing of <br />' the service station, it has been used for various purposes, and <br /> is presently leased to small businesses. <br />' REVIEW OF PRIOR WORK DONE: <br /> On March 16, 1988, the owners filed an application to abandon <br /> 2-1 , 300 gallon UST 's which had been used for storing and dispen- <br /> sing leaded & unleaded gasoline. Permission was given to fill <br /> the tanks with water and secure for a maximum period of 2 years. <br /> Refer to Exhibit 8 for a copy of that document. <br /> On November S, 1986, Jim Thorpe Oil , Inc. (JTO) filed a Permanent <br /> Closure/Tank Removal plan, (Exhzbat Cy ) with the Countv EHD to <br /> 1 remove the 2 UST 's from the property. <br /> After receiving approval , JTO removed the dispensing pumps, <br /> associated piping and the two (2) UST s on January 9, 1989. Both <br /> tanks were in very poor condition when removed. There was <br /> obvious sail contamination, and a strong petroleum odor noted <br /> during tank removal operations. <br /> Soil samples were taken from beneath the ends of each tank by <br /> Canonie Environmental , (now Weston; ) the removed spoil was <br /> returned to the hole, and clean fill was added to replace voioage <br /> caused by the removal of the tanks. The site was later `overed <br /> with asphalt. The two UST 's were transported to a licensed <br /> facility and destroyed. Copies of those documents are ins:luded <br /> as Exhibit D. <br /> The soil samples were analyzed for BTEX , TVPH, EDB„ & total lead; <br /> results, tabulated on Table 1, showed very high levels of bTEX & <br /> TVPH, with total lead ranging from 44 to 64 mg/kg. EDB was below <br /> detection levels in all samples. The laboratory worksheets, test <br /> methods, and chain of custody are included as Exhibit E. <br /> There has been no further environmental assessment work dome on <br /> the propery. <br /> 3 <br />