Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br /> v <br /> dropping the DTW so SVE will affect treatment on the previously submerged soils? <br /> this larger amount of gw will be treated and discharged to sewer? <br /> if so, what part of the effluent MUST be ND for discharge to the City sewer and <br /> outrageous fees to discharge this massive amount of water LIKE CHEVRON <br /> concluded was way too NOT cost-effective don't you understand????? what don't I <br /> understand about this???? <br /> these concerns must be addressed before I issue a permit to pilot or even before <br /> you send it in..... <br /> as I look at my notes, I get the impression (inference) that you would address the <br /> DPE pilot test further in the work plan to do the 'grab gw' work that was due April 09. <br /> obviously not. <br /> Margaret says HOLD OFF until Nuel gets back Monday. I'll discuss it with him <br /> again and get back to you. <br /> most likely a letter will come out of this explaining all and getting the new CUF RP <br /> correctly into the groove of qualifying for reimbursements on 'approved' work plans. <br /> From: Tim Cuellar [mailto:tcuellar@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:06 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: rmarty@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: Blvd. Auto DPE Feasibility WP <br /> Mike, <br /> When we talked at the site, there was a some uncertainty whether or not a work plan had been <br /> submitted for a DPE feasibility test. I have attached a copy of the work plan we submitted to EHD <br /> on 09 Jan. 2009. <br /> 1 would like to proceed with installation of the 2 DPE wells, and coordinate the 5-day pilot study. I <br /> am not sure which drilling company I will use (still needs to go out to bid), but I don't see why I <br /> can't have permit application to you by next week. Would that be all right? <br /> Thanks -tim <br /> Timothy J. Cuellar <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> Stockton • Santa Rosa • N'tonterey • Brea <br /> 10/5/2009 <br />