Laserfiche WebLink
treatment, operation, and analytic costs The prevalence of low permeability materials in the <br /> unsaturated zone may limit the effectiveness of SVE <br /> Recommendation Because MTBE is a contaminant of concern and the low permeability conditions <br /> of the unsaturated soil and the capillary fringe at the site, SVE is not recommended as a remedial <br /> alternative <br /> Combined Soil Vapor and Ground Water Extraction <br /> This remedial technique uses GWE to enhance the vapor extraction of hydrocarbons in unsaturated <br /> soil, the capillary fringe and saturated soil For the same reasons discussed above, this alternative is <br /> not considered cost effective for this site <br /> Soil Vapor Extraction 1 Air Sparging <br /> Air sparging involves injecting ambient air via wells screened below the water table to volatilize <br /> aqueous-phase hydrocarbons Air sparging also supplies oxygen to indigenous microbes and stimulates <br /> naturally-occurring hydrocarbon biodegradation Hydrocarbon vapors are then typically captured and <br /> treated by a SVE system This technique is most effective for sites with hydrocarbons in permeable <br /> materials where the injected air is easily captured by SVE The low permeability materials in the <br /> unsaturated zone at the site should limit the effectiveness of air injection and vapor capture by an air <br /> sparging/SVE system With limited vapor capture, air sparging could cause hydrocarbon migration <br /> Air sparging is not an effective direct treatment for MTBE due to its high solubility <br /> Cost Effectiveness Since air sparging with SVE would require the installation of several air sparge <br /> wells, significant permitting, equipment installation, vapor treatment, operation, and analytic costs, <br /> and because SVE and air sparging are not effective for MTBE, this remediation technology is not as <br /> cost effective as other evaluated alternatives <br /> Recommendation Cambria does not recommend this remedial alternative at this time if research <br /> shows that this alternative is effective in the future, it will be evaluated at that time <br /> Bioventing 1 Biosparging <br /> Bioventing and biosparging are other new remedial techniques for cost effectively remediating site <br /> soil and ground water This technique involves injecting low flow rates of air beneath the water table <br /> in site wells that are screened both above and below the water table The injected air first stimulates <br /> hydrocarbon biodegradation in ground water, and then enters the vadose zone at low flow rates to <br /> encourage soil remediation Unlike air sparging, where air is injected directly into the formation at <br /> high rates to strip hydrocarbons, biospargzng uses low flow injection rates to minimize the potential <br /> for hydrocarbon vapor migration <br /> 240-0783 24 <br />