Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Biosparging up gradient of hydrocarbon sources allows oxygenated water to flow across the source <br /> area and encourage source area hydrocarbon degradation Biosparging down gradient of hydrocarbon <br /> source areas remediates hydrocarbons as they migrate from the source area, thereby containing the <br /> hydrocarbon source area Since bioventing and biosparging may present an explosion risk if oxygen <br /> is mixed with high vapor concentrations, source area bioventing is typically implemented if <br /> hydrocarbon vapor concentrations are well below the lower explosion limit (LEL) Infected air can <br /> also be vented back to the remediation pad to minimize air infection into the vadose zone In some <br /> cases, SVE is performed to reduce vapor-phase hydrocarbon concentrations before implementing a <br /> i <br /> bioventing/biosparging approach <br /> Cost Effectiveness Bioventmg and biosparging is a cost effective method of remediating site soil and <br /> ground water This alternative has not been shown to be effective against MTBE Operation and <br /> maintenance costs for this alternative are typically significantly lower with a biosparging system <br /> than SVE or GWE systems <br /> Recommendation Cambria recommends considering bioventing/biosparging as a potential <br /> contingency plan if other remedial techniques are not effective Before a long-term bioventing <br /> approach is implemented, short-term testing should be performed to evaluate the potential for <br /> hydrocarbon migration and the development of explosive conditions <br />• CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN <br /> Cambria's proposed interim CAP involves the following <br /> Performing periodic GWE from the former tank complex for period of approximately six <br /> months, <br /> Installing ORCs in wells around the perimeter of the site, <br /> Analyzing ground water samples for intrinsic bioremediation parameters to further assess the <br /> ground water potential for natural attenuation and for RBCA parameters, <br /> Assessing the effectiveness of the corrective action, <br /> Implementation of a contingency plan <br /> The plan calls for GWE in the source area and installation of ORCs at the perimeter of the site This <br /> combination should maintain hydraulic control over the source area, remove petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> and MTBE mass from the subsurface, and move oxygen-rich ground water from the perimeter toward <br /> the source area The details of our proposed CAP are presented below <br /> 240-0783 25 <br />