Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br /> Subject: RE: 2705 Country Club Boulevard <br /> N_ Chuck Miller indicated that they would like us to proceed with destroying all of the wells, including the ones <br /> installed on behalf of Exxon, so yes, our intention was to destroy all wells installed under case 1 &2. <br /> In regards to the access agreement issue, Tesoro and Palisades/USA covered this issue between <br /> themselves when the station was sold to Tesoro; ie we simply notify Tesoro regarding the work schedule& <br /> are thus allowed access. If you need something in writing, I'll provide that for you. <br /> Honestly, I had forgotten about the 1-foot diameter larger hole requirement for pressure grouting..I might <br /> re-think just overdrilling all of them to minimize pavement disturbance, but the disadvantage of this is that <br /> fluids between the upper& lower water bearing zone could become mixed during overdrilling with augers. <br /> Scott <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 20114:22 PM <br /> To: Scott Bittinger <br /> Subject: RE: 2705 Country Club Boulevard <br /> Scott, <br /> no real work plan needed. If you complete the well permit application form correctly <br /> (completely) all I need will be on it. I'll take a one page letterheaded note from you telling <br /> me general plan for each PRESSURE GROUT and the same for each overbore. pretty <br /> much a material and methods sort of thing. neat Portland, 25 psi for 10 minutes, <br /> borehole 12inches larger than original borehole, 36inches deep and casing cut off <br /> 6inches above with grout added to 18inches bgs.....or overbore to TD + one foot.... <br /> I'll need bore logs for each overbore well. <br /> when you say "ALL OF THE WELLS...." do you mean Exxon's too? The EHD and the <br /> SWRCB-CUF have this location as CASE 1 and CASE 2...as in two sites... <br /> I have recently heard from ETIC with questions on the NFA letter from the CVRWQCB <br /> and our well destruction procedures. <br /> I will look at your proposal and compare it to the lastest/most recent gw data for each <br /> well. we are taking a stronger approach to ensuring compliance to our Well Standards <br /> and wells that are impacted must have the contents REMOVED or insitu wireline <br /> exploded. <br /> just so you know, <br /> our permits are PER PARCEL. each permit needs a $375 inspection fee PLUS $125 <br /> per well. four parcels = four permits with four fees. <br /> for example, parcel with one well, permit fee = $500. parcel with 10 wells = $1625 ($375 <br /> + $1250) . <br /> any parcel NOT owned by the RP must have a signed access agreement submitted <br /> before I can issue. You know about City and Cal Trans encroachments already. <br /> 9/15/2011 <br />