Laserfiche WebLink
Pilkington North America,Inc. <br /> Site Backgmund <br /> ' Pages I I of 13 <br /> Laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected from the borings indicated that TPH-D <br /> ' constituents were detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits in all samples. All samples <br /> were collected at depths between nine and 12 feet bgs, where TPH-D concentrations were expected to be <br /> highest based on field screening and visual observations. Review of historic data indicated that there has <br /> been little change in maximum concentrations, lateral or vertical distribution since the initial <br /> investigations. The estimated total mass of diesel in soil based on calculations and assumptions as <br /> described in the Soil Investigation Report dated March 30, 2011, was approximately 37,500 pounds, or <br /> 5,300 gallons. <br /> ' Laboratory analytical results of the soil samples indicated that TPH-D was detected at higher <br /> concentrations in the samples collected from borings GP-15 through GP-20, located near the AST <br /> ' containment structure, Test Pit #1, and down gradient from these locations. The distribution of borings <br /> with elevated concentrations coincides with the distribution of recovery wells where free product has been <br /> historically present and recovery operations have taken place. The distribution of borings with elevated <br /> concentrations crossed the primary utility corridor between the main plant and the water treatment plant <br /> near the water tower. The distribution of borings with elevated concentrations also crossed the high <br /> voltage and storm drain trenches.The east-west storm drain utility and the north-south abandoned product <br /> ' piping and current water supply lines may have provided preferential distribution pathways during the <br /> initial release. <br /> A licensed inspector, Bagley Enterprises of Lodi, California, was contracted to visually inspect the diesel <br /> ' storage and piping system. No leaks were identified by the inspector. Pressure testing of the diesel <br /> delivery system was not recommended by the inspector since all piping was above ground and available <br /> to visual inspection. <br /> ' Visual inspection of the 10,000-gallon AST, piping, and distribution system indicated no active leak <br /> occurring at that location. Analytical results, field observations, and the results of the AST inspection did <br /> ' not indicate that the 1,000-gallon diesel tank and associated aboveground piping were an active source of <br /> diesel in soil or groundwater. Analytical results, field observations, and the results of the AST inspection <br /> did not indicate that the 700-gallon diesel tank was an active source of diesel in soil. The laboratory report <br /> ' indicated that the diesel chromatograph patterns from samples collected in the initial release area <br /> displayed a weakly to unmodified diesel pattern, whereas the distal samples displayed a strongly <br /> weathered diesel pattern indicating that natural attenuation is occurring at the fringes of the LNAPL <br /> ' plume. The pattern of distribution of TPH-D in soil generally correlates well to total product removed <br /> from each well. The results of the soil investigation indicated that the source of the LNAPL present in <br /> several product recovery wells is from residual diesel-saturated soils associated with a historic (1996) <br /> leak, and not from an active leak from another source. Investigation activities and results were described <br /> ' in the Soil Investigation Report dated March 30, 2011. <br /> Condor sampled the three Site monitoring wells and two facility sumps during the third quarter <br /> ' groundwater monitoring event conducted on August 3, 2011. The average groundwater elevation <br /> measured in the three Site monitoring wells was 3.53 feet, an increase of 0.32 feet since the previous <br /> monitoring event on February 7, 2011, and the calculated groundwater gradient was approximately 0.005 <br /> ' ft/ft to the northeast. Laboratory analytical results indicated that none of the constituents of concern were <br /> detected in the monitoring wells or the SE-sump. A low concentration of TPH-MO was detected in the <br /> SW-sump. <br /> ' Three diesel recovery and skimmer O/M event were conducted at the Site between April 1 and August 31, <br /> 2011. Free product was observed in recovery wells RW-2 and RW-3, and approximately 2.71 gallons of <br />