My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009276
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2020 10:32:35 AM
Creation date
6/25/2019 8:20:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009276
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012033
FACILITY_NAME
PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19812008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
500 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\fgarciaruiz
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Libbey-Owens-Ford -2- 24 March 1986 <br /> the pit) and #9 (approximately 100 feet to the west of #10). I believe <br /> that the secret to removing the maximum amount of oil from the soil matrix <br /> is to raise the ground water level as high as possible in the contaminated <br /> area without floating oil up into uncontaminated soil . <br /> Libbey-Owens-Ford ( LOF) has placed an air-driven suction lift pump at the <br /> pit and one each in wells #9 and #10. During my inspection, the pit was <br /> pumped nearly dry, even though the ground water level on the sides of the <br /> pit looked to be at the 6 to 8 foot depth (the pit is approximately 12 feet <br /> deep) . Free oil was on the surface of the water in the pit bottom and a <br /> couple of small oil seeps were evident 1/3 and 1/2 of the way up the pit <br /> side. At my request, they shut off the pump in the pit at about 12: 30. I <br /> returned at 2:30 to inspect the pit. One of LOF' s lab employees had turned <br /> the pump back on at 1: 30 (he was unaware of our experiment) so the full <br /> effect of raised ground water was lost. However, about 1/2 of the water <br /> surface in the pit was covered by rafts of oil . <br /> The pump intake in well #10 was placed about two feet below the ground <br /> water surface. The well #9 intake was approximately four feet below ground <br /> water surface. I estimate the pumping rate was approximately 6-10 gpm at <br /> each well . We used a clear bailer and found oil at the ground water <br /> surface in each well . The bailer showed emulsified (or dissolved) oil at <br /> least 18 inches thick in each well . Two inches of dark free oil was in <br /> well #9. <br /> LOF was pumping the pit dry and pumping well below the surface in the wells <br /> to create a depression and discourage migration of oil from the leak site. <br /> While this should work for this purpose, I believe it actually inhibits <br /> j removal of oil from the soil . The fact that very little oil was evident <br /> until the ground water came way up in February indicates that the oil was <br /> trapped in the soil pore spaces. High ground water displaces at least some <br /> of the oil . Free oil and emulsified oil are at and near the top of the <br /> ground water. A skimming pump should be used to draw the oil and emulsion <br /> only from the water surface or just below it. I believe that a combination <br /> skimmer pump and drawdown pump below would have to be operated precisely to <br /> avoid excessive drawdown. Excessive drawdown would probably leave the oil <br /> in the soil pore spaces. <br /> I asked Mr. Quick to set the pump intakes close to the ground water surface <br /> in wells #9 and #10. I suggested that they monitor what those pumps <br /> produce at different levels to see what they pick up and to determine <br /> optimum oil recovery depth. <br /> I recommended that LOF consider selectively flooding or injecting water in <br /> specific areas around the oil plume in order to raise the ground water <br /> level under the plume without encouraging horizontal oil migration outward. <br /> I believe that oil could be concentrated on the ground water surface where <br /> it could be removed. The major problem is that the building is in the way <br /> on the north side of the plume and more oil could be forced under the <br /> building. In addition, care must be taken to avoid raising the ground <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.