My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009276
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2020 10:32:35 AM
Creation date
6/25/2019 8:20:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009276
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012033
FACILITY_NAME
PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19812008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
500 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\fgarciaruiz
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Libbey-Owens-Ford -3- 24 March 1986 <br /> water too high, which would force oil into uncontaminated soil. A possible <br /> alternative would be to push the oil and emulsion all the way to the <br /> surface and collect it there. <br /> 3. LOF' s 27 February 1986 letter to me describes the events which resulted in <br /> up to 4,100 gallons of autoclave oil being discharged within the bermed <br /> tank area on 22/23 February 1986. A basement water sump pump failed and <br /> when the water rose, the oil sump pump picked it up and pumped it into the <br /> outdoor tank. The water displaced oil , which overflowed. The oil sump is <br /> now operated manually. <br /> A total of 2,650 gallons of oil were pumped from the dirt and gravel-based <br /> containment area. Up to four feet of contaminated soil were removed from <br /> the containment area and placed on the ground on the east side of the rail <br /> car unloading facility. The soil from the pit was spread there last summer <br /> and LOF proposes to do likewise with this soil. <br /> LOF did not excavate further for fear of undermining the tank supports. <br /> The contamination continues down to an unknown depth. <br /> There is a dumpster-like container outside the south side of the contain- <br /> ment area. Water is drained from the tank(s) into the container until oil <br /> appears. The container is emptied into the oil/water separator. Earlier <br /> practice was to drain water directly onto the ground in the containment <br /> until the oil appeared. Such a practice, plus the recent overtopping lead <br /> me to believe that the ground water and soil could be seriously contamina- <br /> ted under and around the tanks. <br /> 1 LOF is planning to have an air autoclave in operation by October 1986. <br /> Following start-up and shakedown of the air autoclave, the oil tanks would <br /> no longer be needed. I told Mr. Quick that cleanup, which would jeop- <br /> ardize tank stability, could be delayed until October or soon thereafter, <br /> but that borings, trenches, or monitoring wells would be required in that <br /> area this spring. <br /> Following my inspection we met with Mr. G. Robert Meyer, Plant Manager. Mr. <br /> Meyer explained their plans to install an air autoclave. He asked for authori- <br /> zation to spread out the oily soil from the tank containment area and to <br /> backfill the pit at the leak site after placing a perforated standpipe in it. I <br /> told Mr. Meyer that I would review the file information concerning the earlier <br /> land spreading and let him know. I also said that they can backfill the hole <br /> but that any soil contaminated after backfilling would be looked at the same as <br /> in situ soil already contaminated. I did say;that since we haven't required <br /> removal of contaminated soil yet, they can reasonably hope that we won't require <br /> its removal . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.