Laserfiche WebLink
' GEOMATRIX <br /> ' Grab groundwater data suggest that the residual petroleum present in the soil is not providing a <br /> significant source of dissolved petroleum constituents to groundwater. These results and con- <br /> clusions were reported by Geomatrix on behalf of ChevronTexaco in the report, "Soil and <br /> Groundwater Investigation and Site Status Report"dated August 1998, submitted to the San <br /> Joaquin County Public Health Service—Environmental Health Department(SJCPHS-EHD). <br /> ' At the request of SJCPHS,monitoring wells TW-1 and TW-2 (Figure 2)were installed and <br /> sampled in September 1998 to further assess dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons in site ground- <br /> water. A sheen was observed on groundwater from monitoring well TW-2. Monitoring well <br /> TW-1 was sampled again in October 1998. Because dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons were <br /> ' not detected at concentrations above the State of California Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board, Central Valley Region(RWQCB)water quality objectives (WQOs) downgradient of <br /> ' affected soil, Geomatrix, on behalf of ChevronTexaco,prepared'and submitted the report <br /> "Supplemental Groundwater Investigation Report and Request for Site Closure"dated Janu- <br /> ary 21, 1999. <br /> The SJCPHS-EHD referred the case to the RWQCB. At the request of the RWQCB, a third <br /> ' monitoring well (TW-3; Figure 2)was installed in July 1999 and quarterly groundwater <br /> monitoring activities were initiated and conducted through April 2000. The property sur- <br /> rounding TW-2 was subsequently developed as a residence and, per a November 8, 1999 letter <br /> from the RWQCB to ChevronTexaco, monitoring well TW-2 was destroyed. The well <br /> destruction was performed as detailed in the December 29, 1999 well destruction work plan <br /> submitted to the RWQCB. A summary of the analytical results for groundwater samples col- <br /> lected from the monitoring wells is presented in Table 3. <br /> In summary, investigations conducted at the site indicate that petroleum hydrocarbon affected <br /> ' soil, specifically degraded crude oil or Bunker C oil, was encountered between depths of 4.5 <br /> and 13.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). The lateral extent of residual petroleum in soil on <br /> ' the property is shown on Figure 2. Groundwater occurs at a depth of approximately 5 to 7 feet <br /> bgs and flows generally toward the north-northwest. Groundwater monitoring data show that <br /> the residual petroleum in soil is not providing a significant source of dissolved petroleum con- <br /> stituents to groundwater. <br /> 3.0 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING EVALUATION <br /> A health risk screening evaluation was conducted to assess the potential human health risks <br /> ' associated with residual chemicals detected in soil and groundwater at the site. This evaluation <br /> I:\Doc Safe\6000s\6447.007\HRA\Suland HRA.doc 2 <br />