My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING EVALUATION
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DORSET
>
2532
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508012
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING EVALUATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 1:42:49 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 11:56:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING EVALUATION
RECORD_ID
PR0508012
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007884
FACILITY_NAME
SURLAND HOMES
STREET_NUMBER
2532
STREET_NAME
DORSET
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
23830005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2532 DORSET LN
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEOMATRIX <br /> majority of the risk is from ingestion of groundwater. The noncancer HI for an adult and child <br /> resident is 0.03, which is several orders of magnitude below the target HI of 1. A summary of <br /> the theoretical lifetime excess cancer risk and noncancer HI at the site is presented in Table 4. <br /> Appendix A presents the equations, models, and input parameters used to calculate the poten- <br /> tial lifetime cancer risk and noncancer HI; all input assumptions were based on conservative <br /> default parameters provided in the PEA. <br /> The process of estimating risk has inherent uncertainties associated with the calculations and <br /> assumptions used. Consistent with agency guidelines for health risk assessments, health pro- <br /> tective conservative assumptions and methods were used to address these uncertainties. As a <br /> consequence of using these health-protective assumptions and procedures, the calculated excess <br /> cancer risk and noncancer HI presented in this screening evaluation likely overestimate the <br /> actual health risks posed by residual petroleum at the site. <br /> Based on the screening health risk evaluation, the presence of residual petroleum constituents <br /> in soil and groundwater at the site does not pose an unacceptable human health risk to hypo- <br /> thetical future residents at the site, under the conditions evaluated. In addition, based on the <br /> conservative nature of the PEA evaluation, the presence of residual petroleum constituents in <br /> soil and groundwater should also not pose an unacceptable human health risk to future com- <br /> mercial and construction workers at the site. <br /> 4.0 ECOLOGICAL SCREENING EVALUATION <br /> Geomatrix reviewed the Natural Diversity Database(NDDB; June 2002) maintained by the <br /> California Department of Fish and Game for the Tracy and Union Island quadrangles. Ac- <br /> cording to the NDDB, two adult burrowing owls (i.e., athene cunicularia) were identified in <br /> September 1999 within a one-mile radius of the site. No other endangered, threatened or sen- <br /> sitive species identified by state and federal agencies were located within a one-mile radius of <br /> the site. The surrounding areas north of the site have since been developed into residential <br /> homes and are not likely to support ecological habitats. The residual petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> present at the site reflect historic spills from the OVP which was likely buried at depths of at <br /> least 2 to 4 feet bgs. During site investigations, the majority of the residual petroleum was <br /> found in soil at depths between 4.5 and 13.5 feet bgs. Most ecological receptors, including bur- <br /> rowing owls, are not likely to be directly exposed on a regular basis to affected soil located at <br /> these depths. Burrowing animals create dens in the upper four feet of soil and the area of af- <br /> fected soil is below the root zone of most plants. The results of the deeper soil samples indicate <br /> that the potential health risks to human receptors are at or below the acceptable levels. Given <br /> I:\Doc_SafeV,000s\6U7.007THRA�Su and HRA.ea 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.