Laserfiche WebLink
Ceofogrcuf?erfv+usTru Page 8 <br /> Sol)Groundwater Investigation Report <br /> George's Service <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> August 5 1997 <br /> 1 Although soil samples obtained from MW-4 and MW-5 were non-detect, field <br /> observations of soil condition (ie , screening by OVM) and groundwater sample test <br /> results suggest that the soil and groundwater have been impacted by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons an these areas We feel that the most likely source for the contamination <br /> found in MW-4 and MW-5 is the pump island and associated piping <br /> 2 At this time the plume is not vertically defined The groundwater at 45 feet below ground <br /> surface is highly impacted with TPH-Gas, 9,000 ppb, and BTEX, 160 to 959 ppb The <br /> contamination has already migrated through the plastic clay layer at 40 feet below ground <br />' surface so it is possible that it has also migrated through the clay layer beneath the gravel <br /> layer and therefore poses a possible threat to the deeper groundwater resource used for <br /> domestic purposes The gravel layer at 45 feet may also provide a preferential path for <br /> down gradient contaminant migration <br /> 3 At this time at does not appear that the groundwater plume associated with the former <br /> UST's has migrated to the north to the point that it has impacted MW-7, 75 feet from the <br /> former UST's, or farther to MW-6 or the domestic wells However, if the same down <br />' gradient movement of the plume from pump island is hypothesized for the former UST's, <br /> the groundwater plume may have crossed the Durham Ferry Road and could be impacting <br /> neighboring properties It is also possible that the groundwater plume has migrated as far <br /> as MW-6 and MW-7 an the gravel layer but that it is at a greater depth then the wells are <br /> screened <br /> 4 Groundwater gradient is N20°W at 0 0024 ft/ft <br /> 4.2 Recommendations <br /> Geological Technics Inc makes the following recommendations based on the conclusions <br /> outlined above <br /> o Groundwater monitoring of the existing monitoring wells and domestic wells should be <br /> continued on a quarterly basis to evaluate groundwater quality at the site and determine if <br /> the initial groundwater monitoring results are reproducible <br /> Q Water levels should be collected on a monthly basis for a 12 month period to track the <br />' effects of pumping and recharge of the adjacent wells <br /> o GTI recommends that a passive soil gas survey be conducted at the site and on adjoamng <br /> properties to determine if off-sate migration of the groundwater plume has occurred <br /> Areas that should be addressed are to the north on the properties occupied by the <br /> residences and domestic wells and to the west and southwest under and across Highway <br /> 33 <br /> 0 Due to MW-102 be so highly impacted at 45 feet below ground surface, GTI <br /> recommends that an additional deep discretely screened monitoring well be placed near <br /> the former UST's and target a depth of approximately 75 feet below ground surface <br /> r <br />