Laserfiche WebLink
"04kal Teewa MC Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monrtonng Report <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> August 6,2004 <br />' 1.1.2 Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br /> Vertical groundwater gradients were calculated using groundwater-monitoring wells MW- <br /> 2/MW-102 (shallow/intermediate well pair) and groundwater monitoring wells MW- <br /> 102/MW-202 (intermediate/deep well pair) (Table 5) The site-specific vertical groundwater <br /> gradient for the MW-2/MW-102 pair is 0 0325 ft/ft The site-specific vertical groundwater <br />' gradient for the MW-102/MW-202 pair is 0 0142 ft/ft <br /> The site does not show a trend toward downward contaminant migration between the <br />' intermediate and deep monitoring wells MW-2 is screened from 5 to 20 feet bgs, MW-102 <br /> is screened from 45 to 47 5 feet bgs and MW-202 is screened from 79 to 815 feet bgs <br />' Vertical groundwater gradient calculations have been performed at regular intervals since <br /> August 25, 1997 <br /> ' 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On April 27, 2004, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support (Del-Tech) personnel arrived on-site, <br /> opened the wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding <br /> tape The water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Honda® centrifugal pump or a <br /> Waterra® pump with dedicated tubing as recorded in the field logs (Appendix Q The rate <br /> of well purging was monitored The wells were purged of at least three casing volumes or <br /> ' until the groundwater parameters (temperature, conductivity, and pH) had stabilized <br /> (Appendix Q indicating that water representative of actual aquifer conditions was entering <br /> the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was characterized by three successive readings <br /> within 10% <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least 80% <br /> ' of its initial level MW-7 and MW-8 exhibited very poor recharge and recharged to 66%, and <br /> MW-101 recharged to 77% of their initial level before sampling All water removed from the <br /> monitoring wells and not used as a sample was placed in a properly labeled 55 gallon DOT <br /> (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved container and temporarily stored on-site <br /> A 1-foot stainless steel bailer and stainless steel wire line or a Waterra®pump with dedicated <br /> tubing was used to collect each sample Extreme care was exercised while collecting samples <br /> to prevent agitation of the water contained in the bailer Water samples were transferred <br /> ' from the bailer into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with hydrochloric acid using a bottom- <br /> emptying device that minimizes sample aeration during transfer of the sample. All samples <br /> were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into foam holders and placed into a <br /> ' cooled ice chest for transport to the laboratory <br /> The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br />