Laserfiche WebLink
� Geolagiral T¢clueirsl�tc. Page 5 <br /> j Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No.425.2 <br /> November 17,2003 <br /> l <br /> The results of the September 2003 event are comparable with the results from previous <br /> monitoring events. The following observations are made: <br /> { • The horizontal groundwater gradient, calculated from the water table wells, is currently <br /> towards the north. . <br /> • The gradient calculated from the intermediate wells is to then <br /> ortheast. <br /> • Vertical groundwater gradients were negative in the shallow/intermediate well pairs and <br /> positive in the intermediate/deep well pairs. <br /> • TPH-G concentrations in MW-1 continue to fluctuate within levels usually observed for <br />{ the site. The concentration of TPH-G in MW-1 measured during e thSeptember 2003 <br /> p <br /> event were the lowest recorded at the site in three years. See Figure 7 for a graph of <br /> Benzene and TPH-G versus time (MW-1) and Figure 9 for a contour map showing the <br /> distribution of TPH-G at the site. <br /> • BT.EX & TPH-G concentrations in MW-2 show a relatively stable trend with seasonal <br /> fluctuations since December 2001. See Figure 8 for graph of Benzene and TPH-G <br /> versus time (MW-2). <br /> • Contaminant concentrations in well MW-4 exhibit a historically static trend. <br /> • Contaminant concentrations analyzed from monitoring well MW-5 fluctuates <br /> f seasonally but exhibits an overall increasing trend. This quarter shows the highest <br /> concentrations of TPH-G in MW-5 to date. <br /> "' • For the twelfth consecutive event, well MW-102 did' not contain contaminant <br /> concentrations above the'laboratory reporting limits. <br /> • All three of the domestic wells were non-detect for this monitoring event: <br /> • Dissolved Oxygen measurements are all on the low end of the scale, ranging between <br /> 0.02 and 1.93 ppm. <br /> • Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) measurements are all negative (Table 5) and <br /> corroborating with the low DO values. <br /> I � <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The following conclusions have been drawn regarding the status-of the groundwater at this <br /> site and recommendations for future work: <br /> Conclusions <br /> 1. The water table groundwater gradient historically flowed in a northerly direction. at <br /> about 0.0020 ft/ft prior to May 1998. <br /> 2. The intermediate depth groundwater has flowed easterly, with three shifts to southeast <br /> during September 2000, September 2001 and December 2002. The northerly flow <br /> direction during the December 3, 2001 event was anomalous. The gradient is currently <br /> N360E at 0.0018 ft/ft. <br />