Laserfiche WebLink
Geological Technics Inc. Page 6 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No.425.2 <br /> ` November 17,2003 <br /> ,., 3. Vertical groundwater gradients have been found to be flowing upward, during winter <br /> and early spring, and downward during late spring and summer. Upward vertical <br /> gradients dominate over downward gradients by a 4:1 ratio. <br /> +.• 4. The dominance of upward vertical flow of groundwater may be the primary reason the <br /> contaminants has not impacted the drinking water aquifer. <br /> 5. The shallow water table groundwater plume is laterally defined except to the west. <br /> M Increases in TPH-G concentration in the western monitoring wells indicate that the <br /> plume may be spreading laterally toward the west. <br /> 6. Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the groundwater at the site fluctuate with each <br /> monitoring event. The residual contamination in soil, up gradient of MW-2, remains a <br /> significant source of impact to the groundwater plume. <br /> 7. The deeper groundwater plume is defined vertically since MW-102 and MW-202 <br /> remain non-detect for contaminants, indicating that the contamination is not moving <br /> deeper into the aquifer. <br /> $. The three domestic wells sampled for the event remain non-detect, indicating that the <br /> drinking water aquifer has not been impacted. <br /> Recommendations <br /> The following recommendations are made: <br /> 1. Incorporate the monitoring or the four new groundwater-monitoring wells into the <br /> y. current quarterly groundwater-monitoring schedule. <br /> 2. Prepare and submit a monitoring well installation report for work performed at the site <br /> in October of 2003. <br /> w. 3. Prepare and submit a feasibility study reviewing the best remediation alternatives <br /> available to remediate the George's Service Site. <br /> 4. After review of the feasibility study by SJC PHS/EHD and CRWQCB-CVR prepare a <br /> corrective action plan to implement the selected remediation alternative. <br /> `' 4.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> A.0 This report was prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standard of care and <br /> practice in effect at the time Services were rendered. It should be recognized that <br /> definition and evaluation of environmental conditions is an inexact science and that the state <br /> i, or practice of environmental geology/hydrology is changing and evolving and that <br /> standards existing at the present time may change as knowledge increases and the state of <br /> the practice continues to improve. Further, that differing subsurface soil characteristics <br /> �... can be experienced within a small distance and therefore cannot be known in an absolute <br /> sense. All conclusions and recommendations are based on the available data and <br /> information. <br />