Laserfiche WebLink
f j <br /> CLEARWATER <br /> G R O U P, I N C. <br /> Environ mrrrtn! Sr ire. <br /> water table will mitigate the original concern of vapor screen occlusion, as the water <br /> table fluctuates from a depth of approximately 9 feet below ground surface (bgs) to 17 <br /> feet bgs. However, the water table is generally deeper than 12 feet bgs the majority of <br /> the year. <br /> All parties at the meeting tentatively agreed to this corrective action strategy. <br /> Accordingly, a brief revised corrective action plan is presented in this letter. <br /> Conceptual air sparge and soil vapor extraction air-flow paths and radii of influence <br /> are shown on the attached figures. Predicted flows, vacuums, and influent <br /> hydrocarbons anticipated at start-up are summarized in the attached table. The basis <br /> for much of the technical data discussed here can be located in Clearwater's Problem <br /> Assessment Report, Feasibility Study, and Remedial Action Plan, dated February 21, <br /> 1996. <br /> Air Sparging and Soil Vapor Extraction at a Low Water Table <br /> During periods of a low table (i.e. >12 feet bgs), Clearwater proposes to extract soil <br /> vapors from existing wells RW-1, MW-1, MW-2, VW-1, VW-2, and VW-3, and <br /> proposed well PVW-4 (which will be constructed the same as VW-3). These wells <br /> are located along the axis of the subsurface contaminant plume (Figure 1). The <br /> effective radii of influence of these wells should exert a significant vacuum over the <br /> majority of the contaminant plume (Figure 1). Clearwater proposes concurrent air <br /> sparging into well SW-1 to aid in the volatilization and removal of dissolved <br /> contaminants. Sparge well SW-2 will also be plumbed to the sparge manifold; <br /> however, sparging through this well will only be initiated if it appears the vapor <br /> recovery system can adequately capture additional air flow introduced through this <br /> well, as measured by vacuum pressure measured in MW-7. Conceptual air sparge <br /> and soil vapor extraction pathways for the vertical wells are shown on Figure 4. <br /> It is anticipated that vacuums ranging from approximately 30 inches of water <br /> column (" w.c.) to 50" w.c. will be applied to each vertical vapor well, based on the <br /> results of feasibility testing at the site performed by Clearwater and reported their <br /> Problem Assessment Report, Feasibility Study, and Remedial Action Plan, dated <br /> February 21, 1996. Vacuums will be adjusted based on water table elevation in order <br /> to prevent screen occlusion by upwelling, which will be most significant in those <br /> wells which penetrate the water table. The sum of flow from all six vertical wells <br /> will be approximately 90 to 160 cubic feet per minute (cfm) with an average influent <br /> concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) of approximately <br /> 14,000 parts per million by volume (ppmv) (approximately equal to 42,000 mg/m3) <br /> at start-up. Based these concentrations and flow rates, initial hydrocarbon recovery <br /> rates should range from approximately 338 and 600 pounds per day (lbs/day). Air <br /> will be sparged into SW-1 at a flow of approximately 10 cfm at 3 pounds per square <br /> inch (psi). More detailed information regarding air sparge and soil vapor extraction <br /> Ruiz.4491 W.Durham Ferry.Tracy.CA 2 November 12,1996 <br />