My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006429
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
4491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544625
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006429
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 9:01:18 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 4:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006429
RECORD_ID
PR0544625
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003113
FACILITY_NAME
ZAPIEN MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
4491
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25504003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4491 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> C---------- <br /> LEARWATER <br /> G R O U P ! N C <br /> £rtniranmertta! Sernacrs <br /> VW-1, VW-2, MW-4, and MW-7 exhibited vacuums varying from 0 03 to 0 25 in <br /> w c , while the remaining observation wells RW-1, MW-1, MW-5, and MW-6 still <br /> exhibited pressures ranging from 0 25 to 6.00 in w c Although the sparge vapors <br /> could not be completely controlled by extracting soil vapor solely from VW-3, it is <br /> likely that they could be controlled by a grid of operative vapor extraction points (z e <br /> concurrent vapor extraction from VW-1, VW-2, VW-3, and RW-1) <br /> Dissolved oxygen measurements taken at the end of the sparge test are compared <br /> with initial dissolved oxygen measurement in Table 6 Initial measurements <br /> indicate depleted levels of dissolved oxygen (<2 0 mg/L) across the site The most <br /> depleted wells (<0 5 mg/L) were RW-1 and MW-2, located in the center of the <br /> dissolved plume After the sparge test, dissolved oxygen levels had increased <br /> significantly in wells RW-1, MW-5, MW-6, and SW-1, indicating a radius of <br /> influence of approximately 50 feet Dissolved oxygen measurements collected before <br /> and after the sparge test are presented graphically on Figure 10 <br /> Groundwater elevations measured at the end of the sparge test were compared with <br /> static water levels to assess the effect spargmg might have on groundwater flow <br /> Water levels rose in some wells and fell in others by the end of the test, and the <br /> resulting groundwater table contour was different than the static water table <br /> measured previously Prior to sparging, groundwater flow was toward the northeast <br /> at a hydraulic gradient of 0 0019 After sparging, groundwater flow was toward <br /> northwest and the hydraulic gradient had increased to 0 0028 Groundwater <br /> elevation contours before and after the sparge test are shown on Figure 11 <br /> Analytical results of air samples from VW-3 collected during the sparge test are <br /> compared with results from the vapor extraction test (pre-sparge) in Table 4 The <br /> results for VW-3 show slightly lower concentrations of hydrocarbons in extracted <br /> vapor during sparging Given the increase in dissolved oxygen in surrounding <br /> monitoring wells, one would expect the hydrocarbon concentrations in vapors <br /> extracted from VW-3 during sparging to be greater than concentrations measured <br /> during the vapor extraction test as dissolved hydrocarbons are volatilized by the <br /> sparge A lower hydrocarbon concentration probably reflects the fact that <br /> (contaminated soil one pore volume had not yet been extracted and initially high <br /> hydrocarbons concentrations in extracted vapor continued to decline despite the <br /> addition of hydrocarbons volatilized by sparge air. Certified analytical reports are <br /> presented in Appendix B <br /> If sparging is used in the future as a remedial technology, the potential sparging has <br /> to mound groundwater, and spread contaminants, could probably be effectively <br /> • mitigated by groundwater extraction from one or more recovery wells. <br /> D-107,PAR/RAP 14 lune 11, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.