Laserfiche WebLink
CLEA�k__'W�i6ATER <br /> • frsciron mrntal Serc>:ces <br /> Following recovery of water levels to at least 80% of their static levels, groundwater samples were <br /> collected from the monitoring wells using dedicated polyethylene bailers Additionally, a water sample <br /> was collected from the on-site domestic well (DW) Samples were transferred to laboratory supplied <br /> containers, labeled, documented on a chain-of-custody form, and placed on ice in a cooler for transport <br /> to the project laboratory <br /> Purging devices were decontaminated between wells in an Alconox® wash followed by double rinse in <br /> clean tap water to prevent cross-contamination Purge water and rinseate was stored on-site in Iabeled <br /> 55-gallons drums pending future removal and disposal <br /> All groundwater samples were analyzed by Entech, a DHS-certified laboratory located in Sunnyvale, <br /> California Groundwater samples were analyzed for concentrations of TPHg and BTEX by EPA Methods <br /> 8015 (modified)/8020 and MTBE by EPA Method 8260B <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Results <br /> On May 8, 2000, static groundwater in the wells was present beneath the site at depths ranging from <br /> approximately 16 to 17 feet bgs Gauging data, combined with well elevation data, were used to calculate <br /> groundwater elevations in these wells, and to generate a groundwater elevation contour map The <br /> groundwater flow direction was calculated to be toward the southwest at a gradient of 0 004 ft/ft (Figure <br /> 3) This groundwater flow direction is similar to that in the previous quarters event, but is not the most <br /> common direction observed The flow direction has been observed to change direction from the <br /> northeast to the southwest depending on the time of year This fluctuation of flow direction is most <br /> likely due to local agricultural irrigation activities in the area of the site <br /> Dissolved-phase contaminant concentrations were only present at low levels this monitoring event <br /> Low levels of contaminants were observed in both MW-1 and MW-2 Maximum contaminant levels <br /> found in these two wells were TPHg 360 µg/L (MW-1), benzene 0 84 µ%/L (MW-1), and MTBE 30 lig/L <br /> (MW-2) These levels of contaminants are less than observed in the first quarter 2000 monitoring <br /> event <br /> Samples from the on-site domestic well continue to be free of any petroleum contaminants <br /> Considering the well was not impacted by elevated contaminants levels prior to remediation, it appears <br /> that the well is not threatened by the minimal post-remediation contaminant levels now present in the <br /> soil and shallow groundwater beneath the site <br /> MTBE was the only fuel oxygenate tested for this quarter The previous results indicated that it was the <br /> only fuel oxygenate detected in groundwater samples MTBE was detected this quarter in MW-1 (5 8 <br /> gg/L) and MW-2 (30 gg/L) These levels of MTBE are lower than observed the previous quarter <br /> 7B107C GWMR 2Q00 3 May 24,20(x0 <br />