Laserfiche WebLink
CLEAkRATER <br /> Environmental 5ert 1crs <br /> In late summer 1998, the SVE/AS remediation system was installed at the site Wells RW-1, MW-1, <br /> MW-2 and VW-1 through VW-4 were used to extract soil vapors, which were treated by an electric <br /> catalytic oxidizer An air blower was used to deliver air to the subsurface via wells SW-1 and SW-2 <br /> The system was operational from October 1998 to the end of September 1999, which resulted in 6,638 <br /> hours of total system operation Contaminant recovery from the subsurface was dramatic at first, <br /> averaging approximately 2 lbs/hr during the first five months of operation However, by July 1999, <br /> contaminant recovery rates had decreased to approximately 0 02 lbs/hr For the last three months of <br /> operation, influent TPHg levels only slightly exceeded laboratory detection limits Calculations <br /> indicated the SVE/AS system recovered approximately 7,377 lbs (or 1,209 gals) of gasoline from the <br /> subsurface by the end of September 1999 The amount of contamination recovered from the subsurface <br /> compared well to that calculated to be in the subsurface prior to remediation, although slightly higher, <br /> indicating that the system had removed the vast majority of contaminants beneath the site <br /> Remediation efforts were also reflected by a marked decrease, over two orders of magnitude, in <br /> groundwater contaminants in the source area Prior to remediation, maximum concentrations of <br /> TPHg, benzene, and MTBE in groundwater had been 150,000 gg/L, 9,400 gg/L, and 3,800 gg/L, <br /> respectively Following shut-down of the remediation system, maximum TPHg, benzene, and MTBE <br /> concentrations in groundwater were only 990 gig/L, 13 gg/L, and 150 gg/L, respectively, in November <br /> 1999 Clearwater recommended shut-down of the SVE/AS system at the end of September 1999 because <br />® operational data indicated that it had reached a plateau contaminant recovery The SJCPHS/EHD <br /> approved system shut-down in a letter dated September 20, 1999 In that letter, the SJCPHS/EHD <br /> indicated that groundwater beneath the site should continue to be monitored for several quarters to <br /> evaluate post-remediation trends in residual groundwater contaminants and that confirmation soil <br /> borings would be required in the future to demonstrate remediation of the vadose zone <br /> The mobile catalytic oxidizer was removed from the site in October 1999 However, all vapor extraction <br /> piping remains in the ground, and the above ground manifold was secured (Figure 2) <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Methods <br /> On May 8, 2000, wells MW-1 through MW-7 were gauged for depth to water An electronic water level <br /> indicator was used to gauge depth to water accurate to within ±0 01-feet The wells were checked for the <br /> presence of SPH prior to purging No measurable thicknesses of SPH were observed in any of the wells <br /> Following gauging, wells MW-1 and MW-2 were purged for sampling The wells were purged until <br /> sampling parameters (e g temperature, pH and conductivity) stabilized, which occurred by <br /> approximately three wet casing volumes Groundwater monitoring and well purging information was <br /> recorded on Gauge Data/Purge Calculations and Purge Data sheets (attached) <br /> ZB107C GWMR 2QOO 2 MayN 2000 <br />