Laserfiche WebLink
w _ <br /> Stat <br /> e Water Resources-Control Board ° <br /> Division.of Financial Assistance <br /> I001 1 Street•Sacramento,Califomia 95814 <br /> Linda S.Adams P.O.Box 944212•Sacramento,California•94244-2120 <br /> 5ecretaryfor (916)341-5652♦FA)R6�-3�r� <br /> 7EDards.ca-gov/water—issues/prograins/ustef. <br /> Arnold Schwarzenegger <br /> Environmental ProtectionGovernor' <br /> 'May 13, 2009 MAY 1 4..2009 . , <br /> ,r <br /> ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> A. Teichert & Son, Inc. PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Attn:George Takemori <br /> PO Box 15002 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95851 <br /> UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) CLEANUP FUND (FUND); STAFF <br /> .RESPONSE-T0,1:8-.MONTH--BUDGE—T:-CLA!IM�N.O-000051;F-OR-SITEA'DDR-ESS <br /> 103 E. STREET N; STOCKTON, CA 95201 i <br /> Dear Mr, Takemori: <br /> UST Cleanup Fund staff has completed a re�iew.of your recently submitted 18-month <br /> line item budget projection.. The proposed budget and associated scope of work were <br /> reviewed for general compliance with the "reasonable and necessary' requirement of: <br /> Section 2808.2(b)(1) of',the,UST Cleanup Fund regulations, Chapter 18, Title 23, CCR. <br /> `-z ' dr.', _. rd •s s�'w` 'y , k' . , - A1 .x .. . . . .' "Y,p: ., �.•1:.�..:. _•r.:. Py.. _.�;�,;,. <br /> In addition; the Fund's 5 Year;Review Unit recommended that your site be considered ; <br /> for closure in a "USTCF 5-YEAR REVIEW SUMMARY" dated April 9,2008:; After you <br /> have completed the additional site assessment and groundwater�monitoring requested <br /> by your regulator, we recommend you and your consultant-assemble acomprehensive-comprehensive <br /> closure request package for submission to your lead regulatory agency. An.example <br /> "Table of Contents" for a closure request can`be found attached to-this letter: If your, <br /> closure request is denied by the lead regulatory agency, you may petition the-State <br /> Water Board for case closure. For more information about how to file a closure petition ' <br /> or other UST related petition, go-to the UST.Program website- ,: , r 1 <br /> http://www.waterboards.ca-govlwater issues/ ro ram slust/cleanu P/P etitions.shtmI <br /> ,In your.18-month budget request, a total amount of$124,100 was requested through <br /> Q210, including $44,000 for additional site assessment during Q209 and $44,500 for <br /> risk assessment and site restoration during Q210. However; no work.plans were found <br /> on Geotracker to document the proposed scopes of work, making-it impossible.for Fund <br /> staff to make a reasonable cost determination. Furthermore;. assessing the extent of <br /> 1,2-DCA contamination may or.may not be ameligible activity, depending upon the <br /> usage:of:this compound, which is-not-a normal-.pefroleeam constituent. Therefore,-it is-,. <br /> strongly recommended that a formal pre-approval req_uest be submitted to,the Fund <br /> prior to-commencing these scopes of work <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Z,J2ecyded Paper <br />