My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006864
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
E
>
103
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544638
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2019 3:04:11 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 1:51:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006864
RECORD_ID
PR0544638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004027
FACILITY_NAME
HENDRIX FORK LIFT INC
STREET_NUMBER
103
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
E
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15318001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
103 N E ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.3 Well Development and Ground-water Sampling <br />' After installation, the new monitoring wells (MW-12 and MW-13) were <br /> checked for the presence of floating product and the depth to water was <br /> measured (see Table 1). The wells were developed using a surge block and <br /> hand-pumping techniques by EMCON Associates field personnel on <br /> August 24, 1992. Development water was stored on site in labeled <br /> 55-gallon drums pending receipt of analytical data to determine the proper <br />' disposal method. Since no floating product was detected in the wells, the <br /> wells were allowed to stabilize after development and were then purged and <br />' sampled as described in Appendix D. <br /> In addition, EMCON Associates purged and sampled the existing on-site <br /> wells. Samples were collected from wells MW-10 and MW-11. Wells MW-3, <br />' MW-4, and MW-5 were dry, and well MW-9 was obstructed; therefore, <br /> samples could not be collected. <br /> 1 3.4 Sample Analysis <br />' Two soil samples from each exploratory soil boring were submitted to a <br /> state-certified analytical laboratory for chemical analysis. Soil samples from <br /> borings MW-12 and MW-13 collected approximately 10 feet belowthe depth <br /> of the bottom of the excavation, and the samples collected just above <br /> first-encountered ground water were submitted for chemical analysis. The <br /> soil sample collected from the bottom of boring B92-1 and the sample <br /> collected at a depth of 10 feet from this boring were selected for chemical <br /> analysis. The 10-foot sample was chosen because it had a slight product <br /> odor. The soil samples were analyzed for TPHG, BTEX, and total petroleum <br />' hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHD). <br /> The ground-water samples collected from the new monitoring wells and the <br /> previously installed monitoring wells were analyzed for TPHG, BTEX, and <br /> TPHD. <br />' 3.5 Analytical Results <br /> Soil and ground-water sample analytical results are presented in Tables 2 <br /> and 3, respectively. Certified analytical reports are presented in Appendix E. <br /> The soil samples collected from borings MW-12 and 692-1 did not contain <br /> detectable concentrations of TPHG, TPHD, or BTEX. The soil sample <br /> collected from boring MW-13 at a depth of 41 feet contained TPHG and <br /> TPHD at concentrations of 6,200 and 750 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), <br /> respectively. This sample also contalned toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> xylenes at concentrations of 200, 75, and 440 mg/kg, respectively. The <br /> sample did not contain a detectable concentration of benzene. The sample <br />' pjO\Of9010f900020.1 ag 3 - 3 Rev. 0 December 15, 1992 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.