My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006864
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
E
>
103
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544638
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2019 3:04:11 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 1:51:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006864
RECORD_ID
PR0544638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004027
FACILITY_NAME
HENDRIX FORK LIFT INC
STREET_NUMBER
103
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
E
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15318001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
103 N E ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> 7 PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION <br /> EMCON Associates has prepared the following sections to evaluate the <br /> alternatives for remediating the petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil and <br />' ground water at this site. <br />' 7.1 Soil Remediation Alternatives <br /> The remediation alternatives EMCON Associates has identified can be <br /> classified into two categories: (1) excavation and subsequent disposal or <br />' aeration, or both, and (2) in situ remediation. <br /> In addition to the two categories above, there is a no-action alternative, in <br /> which the impacted soil is left in place, and long-term monitoring of the <br /> ground water is implemented. This alternative has been eliminated because <br /> it is not likely that regulatory agencies would accept the approach given the <br />' remaining petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in soil. <br /> EMCON Associates does not recommend attempting to implement <br /> alternatives involving excavation of the petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil <br /> due to the economics involved in excavating to the depths of impact, and <br /> the difficulty of accessing soil adjacent to existing buildings. Additionally, <br />' excavation would significantly interfere with normal business operations at <br /> the site. For these reasons, soil excavation has been deemed <br />' unacceptable. <br /> Eliminating the alternatives involving excavation of the petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon-impacted soil leaves in situ treatment technologies. In situ <br />' remediation technologies which have successfully been used include <br /> (1) enhanced biodegradation, (2) soil flushing, and (3) soil vapor extraction. <br />' Enhanced biodegradation has successfully been used to remove <br /> contaminants from both soil and ground water. Enhanced biodegradation <br /> typically involves injection of nutrients and oxygen sources under controlled <br />' conditions to enhance biological degradation of organic compounds. In <br /> some instances, this also involves injection of acclimated microorganisms. <br /> The injection process is used in conjunction with ground-water extraction. <br />' This alternative is not recommended due to the technical complications and <br /> expense associated with implementing this technology in comparison to soil <br /> vapor extraction. <br /> pj010f9010*00020.1 ag 7 - 1 Rev. 0 December 15, 1992 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.