My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006865
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
E
>
103
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544638
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006865
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2019 3:02:30 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 1:52:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006865
RECORD_ID
PR0544638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004027
FACILITY_NAME
HENDRIX FORK LIFT INC
STREET_NUMBER
103
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
E
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15318001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
103 N E ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Mr. Dan Barber Project OF90-002.02 <br /> October 28, 1992 <br /> Page 2 <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> Exploratory soil boring BH-1 was drilled at the supply yard north of tank E in <br /> March 1990, prior to the removal of the tank in March 1991. The exploratory soil <br /> boring location is shown on Drawing 1. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel <br /> (TPHD) was detected at a concentration of 2,900 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in <br /> the soil sample collected from this boring at a depth of 10 feet. When tank E was <br /> excavated, a confirmation soil sample was collected and analyzed for total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes; <br /> however, the sample was not analyzed for TPHD. Since the confirmation sample was <br /> not analyzed for TPHD, there remained a question whether the soil beneath and <br /> adjacent to the tank contained diesel. <br /> FIELD ACTIVITIES AND OBSERVATIONS <br /> To determine whether diesel remained in the soil beneath and adjacent to the tank, <br /> on August 17, 1992, Teichert excavated the fill material from the former excavation <br /> using a backhoe. Approximately 2 feet of clean sandy gravel fill were encountered <br />' near the surface just below the concrete pad covering the former excavation. Below <br /> this imported fill were approximately 8 feet of loose native material. This material was <br /> reported by Teichert to be soil which was originally excavated from around the tank <br /> and placed back in the excavation following the removal of the tank. This native <br /> material had no visual or olfactory evidence of petroleum hydrocarbon impact. <br /> At a depth of 10 feet, hard native soil was encountered, indicating the limit of the <br /> original excavation. Teichert overexcavated the sidewalls of the north edge of the <br />' excavation, beyond where soil boring 131-1-1 had been drilled. This area was <br /> overexcavated since the analytical results for the soil sample from the boring indicated <br /> diesel impact to soil at a depth of 10 feet. The native soil encountered at the bottom <br />' and sidewalls of the excavation had no visual or olfactory evidence for diesel impact, <br /> so confirmation soil samples were collected. <br /> Some product odor was detected in the shallow soil at a depth of approximately 1 to <br /> 2 feet. This odor was found to be limited to a thin clay layer, approximately 0.1 to <br /> 0.2 foot thick, located between the asphalt and the underlying sand fill. This clay was <br />' stained gray and had a strong product odor. To determine the origin of this material, <br /> Telchert removed the asphalt north of the original excavation where the product <br /> seemed to be more highly concentrated. In excavating this area and an additional area <br />' east of the excavation, the impacted clay layer was found to be continuous. Since the <br /> clay appeared continuous, and since it was underlain by fill sand, it was concluded that <br /> the clay was placed as a base for the asphalt, and that it was probably saturated with <br /> a heavy petroleum hydrocarbon product consistent with standard asphalt placement <br /> procedures. <br /> piOV9010900020.2aw <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.