Laserfiche WebLink
Mr George Takemort Project OF90-002 05 <br /> November 16, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> contained detectable concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes <br /> (BTEX), however, BTEX was not detected in the other sample Total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHG) were not detected in either sample In September 1988, <br /> the area was overexcavated Confirmation soil samples were collected from the bottom of <br /> the excavation Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in any of the confirmation soil <br /> samples collected during this overexcavation activity <br /> Between December 1987 and December 1994, following the removal of the tanks, soil <br /> borings were drilled and 14 groundwater monitoring wells were installed to characterize the <br /> lateral and vertical extents of soil and groundwater impact ("Problem Assessment Report <br /> and Final Remediation Pian," EMCON, December 16, 1992) Residual and dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons were detected in the vicinity of the USTs Well MW-1 was damaged and is <br /> inaccessible, and well MW-2 was abandoned during overexcavation activities <br /> In October 1993, EMCON performed a soil vapor extraction (SVE) test ("Problem <br /> Assessment Report and Final Remediation Plan," EMCON, December 16, 1992) Results <br /> of the test indicated that soil remediation using SVE was feasible In December 1994, a <br /> remediation system, consisting of an Environmental Instruments 250-cubic-foot-per- <br /> minute thermal oxidizer was permitted, installed, and started up The system operated <br /> until 1996 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING. SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 1998 <br /> On September 14, 1998, a Pinnacle technician measured depths to groundwater and <br /> performed subjective analyses of groundwater from monitoring wells MW-9 through <br /> MW-11 In addition, on October 9, 1998, the depth to groundwater was measured and <br /> groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells AS-1 and MW-14 for <br /> laboratory analyses Well MW-9 was partially obstructed and well purging could not be <br /> performed, therefore, a groundwater grab sample was collected Wells MW-3 through <br /> MW-5 were dry during the site visit Floating product was not observed in any of the <br /> monitoring wells Sampling results and groundwater gradient are shown on Figures 2 and <br /> 3 Pinnacle's sampling and analysis procedures are presented in Appendix A <br /> The surveyed elevations and the depth to groundwater measurements, summarized in <br /> Table 2, were used to evaluate the flow direction beneath the site The flow direction on <br /> September 14 and October 9, 1998, was toward the northeast with a hydraulic gradient of <br /> 0 002 (see Figures 2) Groundwater elevations increased approximately 8 38 feet from the <br /> previous sampling event (May 17, 1996) in wells MW-9 through MW-14 <br /> CP1E\TEICHERTIQTRLYISTOCK-GW DOC-95Vsg 1 <br />