Laserfiche WebLink
Mr George Takemon Project OF90-002 04 <br /> August 21, 1995 <br />' Page 2 <br /> Two soil samples were collected from the tank excavation for laboratory analysis One of the <br /> samples contained detectable concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes <br /> (BTEX) BTEX was not detected in the other sample, and total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHG) was not detected in either sample In September 1988, the area was <br /> overexcavated Confirmation soil samples were collected from the bottom of the excavation <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in any of the confirmation soil samples collected <br /> ' during this overexcavation activity <br /> Between December 1987 and December 1994, following the removal of the tanks, soil borings <br /> were drilled and ten groundwater monitoring wells were installed to characterize the lateral and <br /> ' vertical extent of soil and groundwater impact (EMCON, Problem Assessment Report and <br /> Final Remedianon Plan, December 16, 1992) Dissolved hydrocarbons were detected in the <br /> ' vicinity of the USTs Well MW-1 was damaged, and well MW-2 was destroyed during <br /> removal of this soil <br /> In October 1993, EMCON performed a soil vapor extraction (SVE) test (EMCON, <br /> Problem Assessment Report and Final Remediation Plan, December 16, 1992) Results of <br /> the test indicate that soil remediation using SVE is feasible <br /> In December 1994, a remediation system, consisting of an EI 250-cubic-foot-per-minute <br /> (cfm) thermal oxidizer, was started up The system was designed to extract soil vapors <br /> from wells YtW-13 and IOW-14 <br /> ' SUPPLEMENTAL iNVESTIGATION <br /> The following activities were performed to increase removal of dissolved hydrocarbons <br /> ' and increase the efficiency of the remediation system On May 8, 1995, a geologist from <br /> EMCON observed Woodward Drilling of Rio Vista, California, drill one soil borings <br /> (AS-1) The boring was drilled to 81 feet bgs and converted to an air sparge well (AS-1) <br /> ' The air sparge well was screened between 77 9 and 79 8 feet bgs During the dulling <br /> activities, groundwater was encountered at 66 1 feet bgs, but static groundwater was <br /> measured at 67 6 feet bgs EMCON field procedures are described in Appendix A <br /> ' The geologist collected soil samples from the borings at approximately 5-foot intervals for <br /> possible laboratory analyses and to characterize the geology beneath the site Samples <br /> ' were logged using visual and manual methods, and classified according to the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System Sediments encountered are shown on the logs of exploratory <br /> borings presented in Appendix B Drill cuttings were stockpiled on site and covered with <br /> plastic sheeting On May 8, 1995, the geologist collected soil samples from the stockpiled <br /> soil (one composite of four samples) for laboratory analyses to evaluate disposal options <br /> Because the air sparge well was installed adjacent to well MW-14 and in an area of known <br /> ' SAC\N\Pi0k0F9010F900020 4cs-95 PAS 2 <br />