Laserfiche WebLink
• Town and Country Contractors removed two 20,000-gallon and one 12,000-gallon USTs <br /> (Tanks T-5, T-6, and T-8) and associated dispenser island in March 1999, and excavated <br /> the dispenser area in April 1999 Pinnacle Environmental Solutions (Pinnacle) collected <br /> compliance soil samples during UST, fuel dispenser, and product line removal activities <br /> in March and April 1999 <br /> • Stratus advanced boring B-17 in September 1999 <br /> • Stratus properly destroyed monitoring wells MW-3 through MW-5 and MW-9 through <br /> MW-12 in February 2000 <br /> • Stratus collected compliance soil samples during the removal of a waste oil UST <br /> (Tank T-4) by Savidge Construction in October 2000 <br /> 3.2 2006 Site Characterization Activities <br />' The objectives of the site assessment activities were to further characterize the geologic and <br /> hydrogeologic conditions beneath the site, and to characterize the lateral and vertical extent of <br /> 1,2-DCA impact to groundwater To accomplish these objectives, Stratus advanced nine (9) <br /> tCPT borings (CPT-1 through CPT-9) to depths ranging from approximately 85 to 150 feet bgs at <br /> the locations depicted on Figure 2 Depth-discrete groundwater samples were collected from <br /> separate borings situated immediately adjacent to each CPT boring location <br />' Prior to implementation of field activities, a drilling permit was obtained from SJCEHD <br /> Drilling locations were marked 48 hours prior to fieldwork Underground Service Alert, <br />' SJCEHD, and Teichert were notified 48 hours prior to beginning work activities Field practices <br /> and procedures utilized during this investigation are described in Appendix B All work was <br /> conducted under the direct supervision of a State of California Professional Geologist A copy of <br />' the drilling permit is provided in Appendix C <br /> 3 2 1 Field Activities <br /> A Stratus geologist was on-site to oversee Fugro Geosciences, Inc (Fugro) of Santa Fe Springs, <br /> California (C57-742013) complete the CPT testing and direct push sampling between January 23 <br /> t and 29, 2006 The CPT method consists of advancing a cone-tipped cylindrical probe (1 7 <br /> inches in diameter) into the ground while simultaneously measuring the resistance to penetration <br /> The CPT method estimates soil lithology by comparing the force (cone bearing pressure) <br />' required to advance the probe (QJ to the friction ratio (FR) [(FR equals sleeve friction (FS) <br /> divided by the probe tip load times the penetration pore pressure (UdA Computer generated <br /> CPT logs were plotted in the field to provide a graphical log of subsurface soil lithology A <br /> report prepared by Fugro, which includes logs of all CPT data and graphical geologic logs, is <br /> presented in Appendix D CPT tests were performed in accordance with American Society of <br /> Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method D3441 The approximate locations of borings CPT-1 <br />' through CPT-9 are included on Figure 2 Following advancement to total depth, each borehole <br /> was pressure grouted to surface grade with high-solids bentonite slurry <br /> Groundwater samMples were collected from a separate boring adjacent to the CPT boring, using <br /> the HydropunchT technique Two-inch diameter steel rods pushed the HydropunchTM sampler <br /> • to the desired sampling depth The rods were then retracted to expose a 3-foot long perforated <br />' KITe,chc,1Stockton-I031Report,1scm 04-2006 doc Page 6 STRATUS <br />