Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
1 <br /> I the levee under the deck ind stairs, along a retaining wall and was puddling on the grass and into the roadway <br /> behind the levee" After considerable hand work under the deck, Falcon reported that"the diesel line was joined <br /> at a deep depth[below ground surface] at a puncture point by a rubber hose which had collapsed under the weight <br /> of the fill at that depth" The Falcon report recommended that the broken diesel line as well as two gasoline lines <br /> which also ran under the building should be capped A representative from San Joaquin County Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division (SJCEHD) inspected the purging and capping of the fuel lines prior to the lines <br /> being capped The fuel Imes were then to be run aboveground <br /> According to the 1991 Problem Assessment Report prepared by RESNA, a preliminary soils investigation of the <br /> King Island portion of the site consisted of hand augering 19 shallow soil borings around the marina and store <br /> buildings, the USTs and levee Analytical results were not available for review but a later RESNA report <br /> indicated that free product was discovered in soil boring 10 (SB 10)which was located between the Marina office <br /> and store buildings <br /> A Tani.Removal Report prepared by RESNA documented the removal of a 2,000-gallon, steel, leaded gasoline <br /> UST and associated piping from the King Island property in 1991 The report stated that the UST and pipuag <br /> was in good condition Analytical results for the soil samples indicated non-detectable levels of TPH.,with the <br /> exception of 0 045 mg/kg of toluene Total lead was detected at concentrations up to 47 mg/kg A hand written <br /> note attached to the February 20, 1992,UST unauthorized release report refers to a March 26, 1992 conversation <br /> with Tana LaPage of RESNA (currently Smith) in which it was discussed that lead concentrations would be <br /> ignored by the County since a closure report would not be issued based on the pipes remaining under the building <br /> It was noted that only if a way were found to test under the store could a closure report ever be issued on the <br /> removal <br /> RESNA installed five monitoring wells (MW i-MW5) on the King Island property between March and April <br /> 1991 to determine whether groundwater had been impacted and if so to what extent An additional momtonng <br />' well(MW6)was installed in September 1993 to further define groundwater contamination at the site MW4 was <br /> abandoned and replaced in August 1995 due to an infiltration of organic debris <br />' Review of Quarterly Monitoring Reports prepared between 1991 and 1994 indicated the foIlowmg trends in <br /> analytical results Samples collected from MW-1 and MW-2 were below detection limits for every sampling <br /> event MW-3 has shown non-detectable concentrations for TPH and BTEX for every sampling event,with the <br /> exception of toluene and xylenes (0 9 and 2 4 gg/Q respectively) in the first sampling event <br /> Concentrations up to 6,900 pg/k TPHg , 2,600 TPHd, and 3,300 benzene were detected in MW-4 from May <br /> 1991 through September 1993 Non-detectable concentrations for all analytes were seen in MW4 during the <br /> December 1993 sampling event Concentrations of TPHg ranged from 160 to 260 µg/e until the well was <br /> abandoned un 1995 The replacement well MW4R showed non-detectable concentrations for all analytes dunng <br /> the August 1995 sampling event <br /> Concentrations from 90 to 26,000µg/9 of TPHg, 510 to 570 µg/Q TPHd, and 6 6 to 1,700 µg/e of benzene were <br />' detected to MW5 from April 1993 tluough December 1993 MW5 showed non-detectable concentrations of TPH <br /> and BTEX during the June and December 1994 and the September and October 1995 sampling events <br /> h fur lrccSkJihtkhlni rix <br /> 50133-00 -02 2 <br />