My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007011
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EIGHT MILE
>
11530
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541077
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 12:04:34 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 9:59:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007011
RECORD_ID
PR0541077
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023517
FACILITY_NAME
PS MARINA 5 / KING ISLAND RESORT
STREET_NUMBER
11530
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
EIGHT MILE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
07119006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
11530 W EIGHT MILE RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fa3 ( <br /> i <br /> was drilled to 20 feet in an effort to recover or drill out the casing However, no evidence of <br /> casing was observed in the augers or on the flights <br /> The evacuated boring for former monitoring well MW-4 was grouted using tremae hose from <br /> bottom to 2 feet below grade with neat cement <br /> INSTALLATION OF GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL <br /> In accordance with the "Workplan for Site Investigation" submitted to the PHS/EHD on August <br /> 11, 1995, Smith Environmental installed groundwater monitoring well MW-4R on August 21, <br /> 1995 to replace the abandoned groundwater monitoring well MW-4 The Iocation of well MW- <br /> 4R is illustrated on Figure 3 <br /> Drilling was conducted by Spectrum Exploration, Inc using a hollow stem auger drill rig The <br /> boring was advanced to approximately 18 feet below grade using eight-inch outside diameter <br /> continuous flight augers Drill cuttings and core samples were logged for characterization of <br /> contamination and soil type by an experienced geologist using the Unified Soil Classification <br /> System Descriptions of soils encountered and monitoring well construction details were <br /> recorded on the boring/well log presented in Attachment 1 Soil samples were collected at least <br /> every 5 feet Three soil samples were submitted to Argon Mobile Labs (Certification No 1873) <br /> of Modesto, California for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) <br /> using EPA Method 8020, and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) using modified EPA Method 8015 <br /> During drilling, soil encountered was monitored for organic vapors by placing a small amount <br /> of representative material in a sealed container, then measuring the concentration of volatiles <br /> collected in the head space of the container with a photoionization detector (PID) calibrated to <br /> the benzene molecule The values obtained at each measurement point were recorded on the <br /> boring logs No evidence of soil contamination was noted during drilling Soil cuttings <br /> generated during the drilling process were contained on-site in a DOT approved 55-gallon drum <br /> The soil boring was converted to a two-inch diameter groundwater monitoring well The well <br /> was constructed of two-inch diameter threaded PVC well screen and casing Screen slot size <br /> is 0 020-inch The sand pack material is #2112 prewashed silica sand The well casing was <br /> surged with a surge block prior to placement of the annular seal in order to ensure settling of <br /> the sandpack The well annulus above the sand pack was sealed with hydrated bentonite, in <br /> accordance with California Well Standards Due to the shallowness of the top of the well <br /> screen, 2 feet bgs, only a bentonite seal was installed in the annulus, per discussion with Michael <br /> Infurna of PHS/EHD prior to the well installation <br /> After installation, the monitoring well was developed on August 22, 1995 using a pump and <br /> surge method Development water was contained in a 55-gallon drum approved for hazardous <br />�� N U5007512QR-1995 WP5 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.