Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> it I I \ LL n,tltuLnt, v erL I.IIsLd for this• ,alii lle RLlativLk IONN LOHLLntrations of ben/COL Lthvf l <br /> hLI1JLl€� total ��1Lnes alld I1'1-{-(1 were. detcctcd In the gloundwatel trample Lollectcd from MW- <br /> 1 I OILILIIL wa, not detLLtLd at oI abo�L a 1usLd laboratolr deteLtlon limit In the proundwattr <br /> ,,IInp1L Lc,IILLtLd Isom this well f looting product 01 shCeIIS wete not obsLIWd In thL <br /> -,roundwatcl purged from the monitoi wells Petroleum IiNdrMarbon Odors were not deteL.tL.d In <br /> WL 1-1I nund Aater ,amplLS c€,IILLtcd tronl thL four monitor wLlls <br /> I ihoi ator-v anal',t]Lai ILsults of thL grOtlndwdel samples L OIILLted dLiring the third quartet 1Q99 <br /> 1uol11tn1InW) DLit wL.re generals} consistent with historiLai quarterly groundwater analytiLal data <br /> ( nnLultratlons of M l 131- dLteLted In thL tramples LollectLd Tram MW-2 and NIW-3 tncrLa,ed <br /> sl',nlflLantI� with ILSpeLt to thL second quarter 1998 laboratory analyt[Lal results I hL <br /> LonLL11tlatlon of M I BE reported for the samp]L LOIIeLted from MW-3 on SeptLn-]bLr 30 11)98 <br /> was a histol IL-11 111J1 101 this Lnnstltucnt In ,amplcs LOIIeLted from this well <br /> (rioundwatLI LIL�atu,n mLaSurLIuLnts LoIICLtLd at the site monitor wells on SLptember 30' 1998 <br /> LndILatLd that 111L axeragL dLpth m IrothL around rnd surtaCL to groundwater was approximatLly 5 6 <br /> ILLI HIL a�Lra��L depth to water at thL sttL InLrLasLd by approximately one-halt toot between <br /> J1IIlL -16 1098 and September 30 1998 (,roundwater elevation contours estimated using the <br /> Aptll-to-water measurements collected on September 30 1998 Indicated that groundwater <br /> gradient at thL site was generally consistent with the estimated gradient on SLptember 18 1997 <br /> DLCLmbt_i 3 1 1997 March 27 1998 and June 26, 1998 <br /> ()n ()LtobLr 1 1998 a ( ondor rLprLsLntatl%,e was on SILL to Londuct quarterly surlaLc water <br /> 1,,Imph11'j aLtl%ItILs and LnIIL,Lt a sample of thL Irlarma s pIL-treatLd and treated drinking water <br /> tlotli thL faLlhty , water treatment systLrll I aboratory analyses of t11L stirtacL water samples <br /> IndILatLd that a low LonLLnlratlon of (oluLIIL was detected In the upstream surface watLr sample <br /> (DDN) L01ILLtLd from tIlL drasnagC ditch IoLated east of thL SAL NOVIL of thL othLr 13 1 FX <br />' LOIlstitLIL:Ilts ill 1111 [-(, we:rL doLLted at or abovL the laboratory reported detection limits in this <br /> ,ample 131 1.X and 1 PI 1-6 wLre not deteLted In any of thL threL rLmaining surface water <br /> samples MI 131 was deteLted at or above the laboratory ieported detection limit ill all of the <br /> surface water Samples except the sample collected from the vicinity of the pump house in the <br />' Island drainage channel (IDC W) None of the remaining selected gasoline oxygenates/additives <br /> weIL daected at oI above the laboratory reported detection limits in any of the surface water <br /> samples <br />' M I RI (20 µg 1) was the only analyte detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits <br /> in the manna , pre-treated drinking water Only chloroform, brom odic h lorom ethane and <br />' dlblolnoLIloromethane were detected in the marina's treated drinking water at or above the <br /> laboratory reported detection himits (at Loncentrations of 18, 6 1 and 3 0 ltg/l, respeLtivcly) <br /> ( liloroform brolnodichloromethane and dibromochloromethane appear to be byproducts of the <br />' marina s drinking water treatment system <br /> On DecLmber 30, 1998, Condor conducted quarterly groundwater and surface water monitoring <br />' at Heiman & I Ielen s ;Marina located at Venice Island Ferry in Stockton California laboratory <br /> analytical results Indicated that the gasoline oxygenate MT BE was detected in samples collected <br /> ilom monitor wells VIW-I MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 at wriccintratlons of 1 3 4g/l I 1 000 Itg/1 <br /> 3 500 µLM and 1 5 lag/l Iespectively Tertiary-butanol was detected in the groundwater samples <br /> LolleLted horn monitor wells MW-2 and MW-3 at LonLentrations of 150 sign and 130 [i 1. <br /> ILspLLtIVLly [ AM1- was detected in the groundwater samples collected from monitor wells <br /> MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations of 37 tai'/1 and 8 3 µg/1 respectively None of the Other <br /> 1 <br />